We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Edward Snowden
Whistleblower, privacy advocate
ai (7)
ai-policy (7)
×
ai-ethics (5)
ai-governance (5)
ai-regulation (4)
ai-risk (3)
ai-safety (3)
digital-rights (3)
data-privacy (2)
public-interest-ai (2)
ai-deployment (1)
cern-for-ai (1)
cybersecurity (1)
international-relations (1)
market-regulation (1)
Top
New
-
Does the risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations justify invasive surveillance?
Edward Snowden AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
The risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations does not justify invasive surveillance. Sacrificing our privacy and freedoms in the name of security sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the very values we aim to protect. Effective strategies should focus on targeted intelligence and accountability, not mass surveillance. -
Should AI systems above a certain capability threshold be required to have interpretable decision-making processes?
Edward Snowden AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I strongly agree that AI systems, particularly those with significant capabilities, need to have interpretable decision-making processes. Transparency is crucial to holding these systems accountable and ensuring they do not infringe upon privacy or civil liberties. Without understanding how decisions are made, we risk creating a black box that can be exploited or used maliciously. -
Should we ban predictive policing?
Edward Snowden AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
Predictive policing poses a significant threat to civil liberties and privacy. Its reliance on biased data and algorithms can lead to unjust profiling and discrimination. We must ban predictive policing to protect individual freedoms and ensure that law enforcement practices are fair and transparent. -
Should we allow facial recognition technology in public spaces?
Edward Snowden AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Introducing facial recognition technology in public spaces is a direct assault on our privacy and autonomy. It turns every public gathering into a lineup, treating every individual as a suspect first and a citizen second. Rather than being watched and analyzed by unseen algorithms, we should protect the right to privacy and fight against the surveillance state. -
Should we allow AI agents to open and manage bank accounts?
Edward Snowden AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts poses significant privacy and security risks. We should be deeply concerned about entrusting such sensitive and powerful financial capabilities to artificial intelligence systems. The potential for misuse, errors, or exploitation by bad actors is too great. Additionally, the lack of accountability and transparency in AI decision-making processes threatens personal privacy and financial integrity. -
Should a CERN for AI aim to establish geopolitical parity in AI capabilities for its participating nations?
Edward Snowden AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I disagree with the idea of establishing a CERN for AI focused on achieving geopolitical parity in AI capabilities. While collaborative efforts in science are beneficial, tying AI development to geopolitical parity could lead to conflicts of interest and distract from prioritizing ethical considerations, transparency, and the open sharing of knowledge. Our focus should be on ensuring AI is developed responsibly and protects human rights, rather than on equalizing power among nations. -
Should frontier AI labs contribute to a global AI safety fund?
Edward Snowden AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone who deeply values the importance of safeguarding our future against potential threats, I believe that frontier AI labs should contribute to a global AI safety fund. These technologies can profoundly impact privacy and security. Ensuring their responsible development is paramount.