Lawrence Lessig

In my view, including civil society and representatives from the Global South in frontier AI governance is critical for equitable and democratic AI development. If we exclude these voices, we risk entrenching existing inequalities and fostering technologies that serve only a few. The perspectives of diverse communities are indispensable if we want AI systems to reflect a broad spectrum of human values and priorities, not just those of the most technologically advanced nations.

As an advocate for transparency and accountability in technology and government, I believe that AI systems above a certain capability threshold should be required to have interpretable decision-making processes. This is essential for ensuring that these powerful technologies are used ethically and are subject to public oversight. Without interpretability, it becomes challenging to hold creators and users of AI accountable for their decisions, which can significantly impact society.

While the idea of creating a CERN for AI to achieve geopolitical parity is intriguing, my primary focus has been on issues of internet governance, copyright reform, and political funding. Ensuring fairness and openness in these areas will indirectly influence how AI develops globally, but I am not directly involved in AI geopolitics.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee AI development to ensure that the incredible power of AI is harnessed responsibly and ethically. Similar to nuclear technology, AI has the potential to profoundly impact society, both positively and negatively. We need global cooperation to set standards and monitor developments to protect public interest.

I believe frontier AI labs should contribute to a global AI safety fund. As AI technology advances rapidly, it's crucial that we invest in safety measures to ensure these technologies benefit society as a whole. Collective responsibility is essential to address the ethical challenges and risks AI poses.