Tim Cook

I believe repealing the EU AI Act would be a step backward. Ensuring that AI is developed and deployed responsibly aligns with our values at Apple. Regulations like the EU AI Act help establish a framework that promotes innovation while also safeguarding privacy and fundamental rights.

I believe the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated to ensure it is used ethically and responsibly. As technology progresses, we must prioritize user privacy and prevent misuse that could harm individuals or groups.

The regulation of AI is crucial to ensure it serves humanity ethically and safely. As we integrate more AI into our devices and services, having a clear regulatory framework can help protect user privacy, prevent biases, and ensure that AI deployments enhance societal benefits without detrimental impacts.

As a proponent for user privacy and security, I believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. These audits ensure that the algorithms making decisions in our lives are transparent, fair, and respect users' privacy.

I believe that offering regulatory exemptions for small companies is essential for fostering innovation. It gives them the flexibility to experiment with AI without the burden of heavy compliance. However, this must be balanced with responsible stewardship to ensure trust and safety in AI advancements.

I believe that the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. Each region must take steps to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a way that respects privacy and human rights. Regulatory harmonization is important, but it should not delay necessary protections.

I believe that as AI systems become more advanced, it is crucial for their decision-making processes to be interpretable. Transparency and accountability are essential to ensure trust and ethical standards in technology. At Apple, we are committed to creating technology that people can rely on, and interpretable AI is a key part of that vision.

I believe we should allow AI agents to open and manage bank accounts. The integration of AI in finance can bring about significant efficiencies and advancements. AI can streamline processes, reduce errors, and provide personalized services to customers. However, it is crucial that we implement robust security measures and ensure transparency in AI operations to maintain trust and safeguard privacy.

While AI has transformative potential in many fields, I believe that important medical decisions should ultimately be made by qualified healthcare professionals. Human judgment, empathy, and the ability to understand nuanced patient needs cannot be fully replicated by AI.

I believe that while the threat of AI misuse by terrorist organizations is real and concerning, it does not justify invasive surveillance. Privacy and civil liberties are fundamental human rights that must be protected. We must find ways to address these security threats without compromising on privacy.

As a technology leader, I recognize the potential that digital humans with full cognitive abilities could bring to various industries. However, we must carefully consider the ethical, social, and privacy implications before fully endorsing such development. It's a complex issue that requires a balanced approach and broad societal input.

I believe that frontier AI labs have a responsibility to contribute to a global AI safety fund. As we innovate in AI, ensuring its safe and ethical use is paramount. By pooling resources into a global fund, we can support research and initiatives that focus on the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies, benefiting everyone.

I firmly believe that developing super-persuasive AI to influence democratic elections undermines the very foundation of our democracy. Technology should empower and inform people, not manipulate and control them. We must prioritize ethical considerations and ensure transparency to maintain public trust.

I believe that while AI holds incredible potential to reshape industries and improve lives, a balanced approach is necessary. Establishing regulations requires careful consideration to encourage innovation while ensuring responsible and ethical development, but I am cautious about imposing an outright pause.