We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Noam Chomsky
Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ai (6)
ai-policy (6)
×
ai-governance (5)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-risk (3)
ai-safety (3)
international-relations (2)
research-policy (2)
ai-deployment (1)
cern-for-ai (1)
cybersecurity (1)
data-privacy (1)
defense (1)
digital-rights (1)
Top
New
-
Should we allow AI agents to open and manage bank accounts?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts raises profound ethical and security concerns. AI systems lack the capacity for human judgment and understanding, essential in handling personal financial matters. The potential for abuse and manipulation is significant, and we must prioritize human oversight and accountability in financial systems. -
Would the public domain status of the RAE dictionary enable the development of more precise LLMs in Spanish?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
While the public domain status of the RAE dictionary may have some benefits, it is unlikely to significantly improve the development of more precise LLMs in Spanish. Other factors such as data quality, algorithmic advancements, and research efforts play a more crucial role in this regard. -
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
Autonomous lethal weapons pose a grave danger to humanity and imperil the very ethics of warfare. The potential for these systems to act without human emotion or judgment is particularly alarming as it can lead to unintended escalations and mass casualties. Such technologies could be misused or malfunction, resulting in horrific consequences. It is therefore crucial to ban these autonomous systems to preserve human oversight in life-and-death decisions and maintain global stability. -
Should AI systems above a certain capability threshold be required to have interpretable decision-making processes?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe AI systems, especially those with significant capabilities, must have interpretable decision-making processes. This is crucial for ensuring accountability and ethical use, as well as understanding their potential impact on society. Transparency in AI can help prevent misuse and align these systems with human values. -
Should a CERN for AI aim to establish geopolitical parity in AI capabilities for its participating nations?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I am concerned that establishing a CERN for AI with the aim of achieving geopolitical parity might diminish focus on ethical considerations and social impacts. It is crucial to prioritize how these technologies affect humanity over merely balancing power among nations. -
Should frontier AI labs contribute to a global AI safety fund?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply concerned with the societal implications of technology, I believe frontier AI labs should contribute to a global AI safety fund. It's imperative that we address the potential risks of AI, and this collective responsibility ensures ethical considerations remain at the forefront of innovation.