We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Noam Chomsky
Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ai (5)
ai-risk (5)
×
ai-governance (4)
ai-safety (4)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-policy (3)
ai-regulation (2)
competition (1)
defense (1)
existential-risk (1)
international-relations (1)
law (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
transparency (1)
trust-in-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Will AI probably cause a concentration of power?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I believe AI is likely to concentrate power further in the hands of large corporations and governments. This could exacerbate existing social inequalities and limit individual freedoms, as those who control the data and algorithms will have significant influence over society. -
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
Autonomous lethal weapons pose a grave danger to humanity and imperil the very ethics of warfare. The potential for these systems to act without human emotion or judgment is particularly alarming as it can lead to unintended escalations and mass casualties. Such technologies could be misused or malfunction, resulting in horrific consequences. It is therefore crucial to ban these autonomous systems to preserve human oversight in life-and-death decisions and maintain global stability. -
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Noam Chomsky AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While the rapid advancement of AI technology carries potential risks, labeling it as an existential threat without nuanced understanding and clear evidence might not capture the whole picture. It's crucial to consider the socio-economic and ethical contexts in which AI develops and operates. -
Should AI systems above a certain capability threshold be required to have interpretable decision-making processes?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe AI systems, especially those with significant capabilities, must have interpretable decision-making processes. This is crucial for ensuring accountability and ethical use, as well as understanding their potential impact on society. Transparency in AI can help prevent misuse and align these systems with human values. -
Should frontier AI labs contribute to a global AI safety fund?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply concerned with the societal implications of technology, I believe frontier AI labs should contribute to a global AI safety fund. It's imperative that we address the potential risks of AI, and this collective responsibility ensures ethical considerations remain at the forefront of innovation.