We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (7)
ai-regulation (7)
ai-safety (7)
ai-policy (6)
policy (6)
ai-ethics (4)
regulations (4)
ai (3)
existential-risk (3)
future (3)
agi (2)
ethics (2)
international-relations (2)
research-policy (2)
ai-risk (1)
Top
New
-
Connor Leahy votes For and says:
As AIs grow more autonomous and dangerous, the government must have the power to shut them down when they threaten national security. The AI Kill Switch Act gives the U.S. government powers to do just that: a common sense action that Americans overwh...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026) -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
468 opinionsConnor Leahy votes For and says:
As AIs grow more autonomous and dangerous, the government must have the power to shut them down when they threaten national security. The AI Kill Switch Act gives the U.S. government powers to do just that: a common sense action that Americans overwh...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026) -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
133 opinionsConnor Leahy votes For and says:
The primary prerequisite to even considering starting to work on a safe ASI plan is to have a global ASI ban and powerful enforcement already in place. Unsafe ASI is vastly easier to build than controlled ASI, and is on the same tech path.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
155 opinionsConnor Leahy votes For and says:
The primary prerequisite to even considering starting to work on a safe ASI plan is to have a global ASI ban and powerful enforcement already in place. Unsafe ASI is vastly easier to build than controlled ASI, and is on the same tech path.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026) -
Connor Leahy votes Against and says:
All of these approaches are terrible. No one has a plan, no one is making any meaningful progress towards anything that even resembles alignment. [...] Alignment is way too hard, maybe impossible. [...] The product work was an attempt to make Conject...
more Unverifiable source (2026) -
Connor Leahy votes For and says:
The primary prerequisite to even considering starting to work on a safe ASI plan is to have a global ASI ban and powerful enforcement already in place. Unsafe ASI is vastly easier to build than controlled ASI, and is on the same tech path.
Unverified source (Apr 16, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Connor Leahy votes For and says:
Most of the AI safety community has been far too coy about extinction risk. We're not. It's not that complicated: AI smarter than humanity poses an unacceptable risk of human extinction, and we need an [international ban].
Unverifiable source (2026) -
Connor Leahy votes Against and says: