We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Stephen Hawking
Theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Wikipedia
Location: United Kingdom
ai-ethics (10)
×
ai (9)
ai-governance (8)
ai-risk (8)
ai-regulation (7)
ai-safety (7)
ai-policy (6)
existential-risk (5)
ai-alignment (2)
ai-deployment (2)
transparency (2)
trust-in-ai (2)
competition (1)
defense (1)
digital-rights (1)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As a scientist dedicated to understanding the universe, I believe we must take caution with technologies that can be repurposed for dangerous ends. Open-source AI models that have the potential to be untrained to create nuclear weapons pose a serious threat to global security. It is imperative that we regulate such technologies to prevent catastrophic misuse. -
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. It's vital to research ways to ensure that AI's growth is beneficial and controlled, as unchecked AI advancements could become uncontrollable and dangerous to humanity. -
Would competing ASIs be positive for humans?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I strongly disagree with the idea that competing artificial superintelligences (ASIs) would be positive for humans. The potential risks far outweigh any benefits. Competing ASIs could lead to unpredictable and dangerous outcomes, jeopardizing our very existence. Collaboration and strict regulation are essential to ensure the safe development of AI technologies. -
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
Autonomous lethal weapons could fundamentally change the landscape of warfare and could lead to unintended consequences. Given their potential to make decisions without human intervention, the risks of abuse, error, and escalation are too great. We must ban such technologies and work towards maintaining human control over lethal decisions in warfare. -
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
AI systems, especially those impacting human lives, should indeed be transparent. Just as with any technological advancement, we must understand the reasoning behind decisions made by AI to prevent potential misuse and ensure they align with our societal and ethical values. -
Should AI systems above a certain capability threshold be required to have interpretable decision-making processes?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As AI systems become increasingly capable, it is crucial for their decision-making processes to be interpretable. Understanding how these systems reach conclusions is essential for ensuring their safety, reliability, and ethical use. We must be able to trust and scrutinize AI to prevent unintended consequences and align them with human values. -
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I believe the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from developing competing ASIs to ensure strict control and ethical oversight. Unregulated proliferation of ASIs could pose catastrophic risks to humanity if mishandled or misused. -
Shall we permit the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Developing digital humans with full cognitive abilities poses immense ethical and existential risks. We are venturing into unknown territory where the consequences could be catastrophic. It is crucial to assess the potential threats to our humanity and ensure safeguards are in place before taking such steps. -
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I strongly believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement poses a significant threat to humanity. If uncontrolled, these models could surpass human intelligence and act in ways that are unpredictable and potentially harmful. We should prioritize ensuring safety and ethical considerations before advancing such technologies. -
Should we treat robots with the same rights as humans?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:
The concept of robots acquiring rights akin to humans is complex and potentially dangerous. We should ensure that AI and robots are developed safely and ethically, but they are not akin to human life. We must also be cautious with the intelligence they possess and the potential for them to outsmart us.