Comment by Tommaso Costa

StatModeling commenter comparing market-origin and lab-origin likelihoods
Using a log-normal model to allow for a fourfold uncertainty in early counts, the data are about 10 times more likely under the market-origin scenario than the lab-origin scenario. My calculation was a deliberately simple likelihood comparison: given some realistic-seeming starting assumptions and early case-count estimates, how well does each scenario generate the observed infections after the first month?
AI Verified (Aug 13, 2025)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Tommaso explicitly offers a Bayes-factor likelihood comparison between market-origin and lab-origin scenarios, so the quote is directly on-topic. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Tommaso explicitly offers and defends a Bayes-factor likelihood comparison between market-origin and lab-origin scenarios, supporting the statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The cited StatModeling source contains the stored wording across Tommaso Costa's August 12-13, 2025 comments, including the Bayes-factor sentence and the follow-up explanation. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 1h ago
replying to Tommaso Costa