YouCongress
Explore About Sign up

Comment by Michael Osterholm

Human avatar
Epidemiologist and director of the University of Minnesota Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.
So all I can say is at this point, I think the evidence is more supportive of a spillover event than it was with an actual lab leak.
AI Verified (Mar 23, 2023)
Source:
Michael Osterholm, “Episode 127: A Tough Two Weeks,” CIDRAP, March 23, 2023.
Like Share on X 2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

COVID-19 originated from a lab-related incident rather than natural zoonotic spillover
abstains
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Osterholm says evidence favors spillover over lab leak, directly opposing the lab-incident claim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Spillover evidence favored over lab leak matches against. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified CIDRAP episode source attributes this spillover-over-lab-leak assessment to Michael Osterholm. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago
replying to Michael Osterholm

Other opinions from Michael Osterholm

See all

Other authors to follow

Jonathan Jonathan Rootclaim blog author Andrew T. Levin Andrew T. Levin Economist, Professor at Dartmouth College and NBER Research Associate OpenAI OpenAI AI research organization Scott Alexander Scott Alexander Author and psychiatrist Yoshua Bengio Yoshua Bengio AI Pioneer, Turing Award winner Demis Hassabis Demis Hassabis Nobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMind Anthropic Anthropic AI safety research company Richard H. Ebright Richard H. Ebright Molecular biologist, Rutgers University; Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Chris Lehane Chris Lehane OpenAI chief global affairs officer