YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Stefan Buijsman

Human avatar
Philosopher of science and associate professor at Delft University of Technology, specializing in AI explainability and ethics.
The explanations of AI systems that we can currently offer typically fall short of the stated goals (including mine for appropriate reliance and system improvement), so it seems that if we truly have a strong requirement that systems are explainable then we simply cannot currently use AI systems in high-risk settings.
AI Verified (Feb 27, 2026)
Source:
Stefan Buijsman, “Accuracy is not all you need! The Reasons to Require AI Explainability,” Minds and Machines, February 27, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: Buijsman argues a strong explainability requirement precludes current AI use in high-risk settings. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Verified for: Buijsman supports a strong explainability requirement for AI in high-risk settings. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the Springer article (Buijsman, 27 Feb. 2026) contains this wording. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Stefan Buijsman