YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Stefan Buijsman

Human avatar
Philosopher of science and associate professor at Delft University of Technology, specializing in AI explainability and ethics.
I propose in Sect. 5 that a lack of explainability may not give an immediate reason to reject the use of an AI system. It does, however, give us a strong reason to look for alternative setups that allow us to meet more of the procedural requirements of decision-making as well as better socio-technical systems.
AI Verified (Feb 27, 2026)
Source:
Stefan Buijsman, “Accuracy is not all you need! The Reasons to Require AI Explainability,” Minds and Machines, February 27, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The passage directly addresses explainability requirements for AI systems and argues for decision setups that satisfy procedural explainability. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 52min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote favors systems that meet procedural decision-making requirements; its cited Springer article frames explainability as a requirement and calls for alternative designs when AI is opaque. This supports requiring interpretable AI above a threshold. Vote author Stefan Buijsman matches the quote author; recorded answer is for. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 33min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Springer article (27 Feb 2026) contains the exact passage and identifies Stefan Buijsman as sole author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 52min ago
replying to Stefan Buijsman