YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Stuart J. Russell

Human avatar
AI Expert and Professor
This is not a ban or even a moratorium in the usual sense. It’s simply a proposal to require adequate safety measures for a technology that, according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction. Is that too much to ask?
AI Verified (Mar 27, 2026)
Source:
Stuart J. Russell, quoted in Future of Life Institute, “Prominent Scientists, Faith Leaders, Policymakers and Artists Call for a Prohibition on Superintelligence,” March 27, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote supports requiring safety/control safeguards before pursuing superintelligence, making support for the safer pause-and-alignment approach substantially more likely. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The author advocates safety/control requirements before superintelligence; that supports the recorded “for” answer to the pause-and-alignment safety statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Future of Life Institute press release (27 Mar 2026), which reproduces this wording and attributes it to the author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Stuart J. Russell