Comment by Paul Nowak

General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC).
Great technological transitions only result in meaningful social progress when they are shaped actively and decisively. The Industrial Revolution – often casually invoked to describe the possibilities of AI – saw fifty years of wage stagnation while profits soared. It took the difficult birth of the labour movement to tip technological gains towards workers’ interests and broader social wellbeing. To deliver on the promise of technology to enhance lives, inside and out of the workplace, AI must be designed, governed and negotiated by and for workers. Our guiding principle is simple: change must be done with working people, not to them.
AI Verified (May 29, 2026)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Nowak warns that AI gains otherwise flow away from workers and insists on worker governance; this meaningfully bears on a permanent AI-driven underclass. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded answer “against” matches: Nowak describes harmful AI outcomes as contingent on governance and argues worker-led design can instead enhance lives. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified IPPR’s 29 May 2026 press story attributes this wording to Paul Nowak; the stored text matches the quoted passage. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago
replying to Paul Nowak