We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Thomas Kwa
Technical Staff at METR and AI-safety researcher.
The game theory doesn't work out this way. In two player models, the US and China can always each get a geopolitical power advantage from developing an AI more powerful than socially optimal, and so have an incentive to defect.AI Verified (Jul 9, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses a material Plan A element—verifiable international coordination, a managed slowdown, transparency, or safety governance—and supports or critiques adoption accordingly.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 54min ago
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses a material Plan A element—verifiable international coordination, a managed slowdown, transparency, or safety governance—and supports or critiques adoption accordingly.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 55min ago
AI Verified
Argues Plan A’s game theory fails because parties would defect; directly relevant opposition.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote’s explicit position supports the recorded vote on adopting Plan A, or identifies a material objection consistent with the recorded opposition.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 54min ago
AI Verified
Says Plan A’s game-theoretic logic fails because participants would defect.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Reviewed the linked primary source: the attributed author, quoted wording, and stated date match the cited publication.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 55min ago
AI Verified
LessWrong source contains the exact comment by Thomas Kwa.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to Thomas Kwa