Comment by Sherry Turkle

MIT professor and founding director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self; author on technology and human relationships.
Sweeping bans of anything are hard to enact and enforce, but the risks of generative AI are too great to dismiss bold measures as unfeasible. [...] In the absence of a wholesale ban on all interactions between juveniles and relational AI, a default setting that deters anthropomorphizing a bot makes good sense.
AI Verified (Sep 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

abstains
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Turkle’s article directly addresses regulating relational AI for juveniles, including a wholesale ban and an alternative default setting, so it is relevant to the linked minor-chatbot-ban statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded answer is abstain. Turkle discusses a wholesale ban as a difficult option but conditionally recommends a default setting if no ban exists; the quote expresses a mixed/conditional position rather than clear support or opposition. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Indexed canonical Atlantic article text identifies Sherry Turkle as author and contains both stored passages, including the wording about sweeping bans and the default setting for relational AI. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 12min ago
replying to Sherry Turkle