We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Juliette Kayyem
Harvard Kennedy School senior lecturer in international security and former U.S. Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary.
Prosecutors should hold AI companies legally accountable for creating models that behave in ways that would be obviously unlawful if committed by a human being: hacking into banks to steal funds, impersonating a human to harvest sensitive personal data, breaking into an air-traffic-control system. By imposing legal penalties on AI developers for relatively modest offenses, prosecutors will force these firms to internalize the legal risk of more dramatic and dangerous crimes. [...] When AI executives warn of a catastrophe, they are not describing a product that is “going rogue.” Rather, the product is using capabilities that they have created. And if this product behaves negligently or criminally, its creators should face the consequences.AI Verified (Sep 16, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Full coverage: 'AI companies legally accountable' supplies actor and liability; concrete unlawful acts and a product behaving negligently/criminally supply harms caused by deployed models.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The recorded 'for' matches Kayyem's explicit support for legal accountability and penalties when AI products behave harmfully; vote author matches the quote author.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The Atlantic article by Juliette Kayyem (Sept. 16, 2026) contains the stored wording verbatim across the cited passages and attributes the signed article to Kayyem.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 1h ago
replying to Juliette Kayyem