Comment by Juliette Kayyem

Harvard Kennedy School senior lecturer in international security and former U.S. Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary.
Prosecutors should hold AI companies legally accountable for creating models that behave in ways that would be obviously unlawful if committed by a human being: hacking into banks to steal funds, impersonating a human to harvest sensitive personal data, breaking into an air-traffic-control system. By imposing legal penalties on AI developers for relatively modest offenses, prosecutors will force these firms to internalize the legal risk of more dramatic and dangerous crimes. [...] When AI executives warn of a catastrophe, they are not describing a product that is “going rogue.” Rather, the product is using capabilities that they have created. And if this product behaves negligently or criminally, its creators should face the consequences.
AI Verified (Sep 16, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Full coverage: 'AI companies legally accountable' supplies actor and liability; concrete unlawful acts and a product behaving negligently/criminally supply harms caused by deployed models. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The recorded 'for' matches Kayyem's explicit support for legal accountability and penalties when AI products behave harmfully; vote author matches the quote author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The Atlantic article by Juliette Kayyem (Sept. 16, 2026) contains the stored wording verbatim across the cited passages and attributes the signed article to Kayyem. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Juliette Kayyem