YouCongress
Explore About Sign up

Comment by Max Moran

Avatar
Senior Fellow at the Revolving Door Project focused on financial regulation, technology, antitrust, and campaign finance.
It seems likely that the answer looks more like setting standards for other businesses while ensuring courts and attorneys general hold AI businesses liable for foreseeable uses of their technology—including enforcing existing laws about hacking and cyber attacks—not granting exemptions to AI developers.
AI Verified (Sep 18, 2026)
Source:
Max Moran, “What Congress Actually Needs to Do About AI: Staff Up,” The American Prospect, September 18, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Full coverage: “AI businesses” are the actor, “hold ... liable” is the requirement, and “foreseeable uses ... hacking and cyber attacks” covers deployed use and resulting harms. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer is for: Moran explicitly supports holding AI businesses liable for foreseeable harmful uses of their technology. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The American Prospect page dated 2026-09-18 reproduces the stored wording verbatim and identifies Max Moran as author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Max Moran