Comment by Emily Otto

Johns Hopkins SAIS PhD student and Alperovitch PhD Fellow researching cyber conflict, AI, and national security; former U.S. Army cyber officer.
This past weekend, the head of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, announced that his company would be taking voluntary steps to slow the pace of development as a result of growing worries about model capabilities. It’s a start, but it’s not nearly enough. Given the dangers that self-improving AI could pose, the United States should consider leading by example and implementing a simple rule: No U.S. AI lab should be permitted to fully automate its research and development pipeline.
AI Verified (Sep 15, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly describes steps to slow AI development as a start and argues for a binding limit on lab R&D automation; it covers the statement and establishes a stance. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded answer for matches: Otto supports slowing AI development and a binding limit on fully automated AI-lab R&D. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The Washington Post's 2026-09-15 article contains the stored wording and identifies Emily Otto as author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
replying to Emily Otto

Other authors to follow