We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Emily Otto
Johns Hopkins SAIS PhD student and Alperovitch PhD Fellow researching cyber conflict, AI, and national security; former U.S. Army cyber officer.
This past weekend, the head of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, announced that his company would be taking voluntary steps to slow the pace of development as a result of growing worries about model capabilities. It’s a start, but it’s not nearly enough. Given the dangers that self-improving AI could pose, the United States should consider leading by example and implementing a simple rule: No U.S. AI lab should be permitted to fully automate its research and development pipeline.AI Verified (Sep 15, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly describes steps to slow AI development as a start and argues for a binding limit on lab R&D automation; it covers the statement and establishes a stance.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Recorded answer for matches: Otto supports slowing AI development and a binding limit on fully automated AI-lab R&D.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The Washington Post's 2026-09-15 article contains the stored wording and identifies Emily Otto as author.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 19d ago
replying to Emily Otto