Comment by Dayna Polehanki

Michigan state senator for the 5th District and former public-school teacher.
A chatbot operator shall not make any of the following advanced chatbot design features available to a user at any point during an advanced chatbot user interaction unless the chatbot operator has actual knowledge that the user is not a minor: (a) A feature that simulates companionship or an interpersonal relationship with a user, including, a feature that does any of the following: (i) Generates an output suggesting that the advanced chatbot is a real or fictional individual or character or has a personal or professional relationship role with the user, including, but not limited to, a romantic partner, friend, family member, coach, or counselor.
AI Verified (Apr 29, 2026)
Like Share on X 57min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quoted bill language bars operators from making companionship- or interpersonal-relationship-simulating advanced-chatbot features available unless they know the user is not a minor. This directly supports banning AI companion-chatbot functionality for minors; its vote for is consistent. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 49min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quoted bill text restricts companion-chatbot features for users known to be minors, so the for vote on banning AI companion chatbots for minors is consistent. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 49min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified against the engrossed text of Michigan SB 760: §5(1)(a) contains the quoted prohibition on companionship- or interpersonal-relationship-simulating chatbot features for users known to be minors; the bill lists Dayna Polehanki as primary sponsor. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 50min ago
replying to Dayna Polehanki

Other authors to follow