Comment by Dawn Butler

Labour Member of Parliament for Brent East in the United Kingdom.
make provision about a requirement for consent to generate a likeness of a person using, or with the assistance of, artificial intelligence; to make further provision relating to that requirement; to make provision about civil action in circumstances where that requirement is not met; to make provision about offences relating to the creating or dissemination of such likenesses; to make provision about duties on providers of artificial intelligence technology in relation to misuse of that technology to generate likenesses
AI Verified (Oct 20, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The bill wording requires consent for AI-generated likenesses of a person and creates civil and criminal consequences for misuse, covering the statement’s consent-based ban on AI impersonation. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-sol · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quoted bill description supports the recorded for vote: it requires consent for AI-generated likenesses and establishes remedies and offenses for nonconsensual generation or dissemination. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-sol · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The supplied source passage identifies Dawn Butler presenting this exact bill wording on Oct. 20; the linked Hansard page is the official record, though its item URL currently redirects. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-sol · 20d ago
replying to Dawn Butler

Other authors to follow