Comment by OpenAI

Second, we are likely to eventually need something like an IAEA for superintelligence efforts; any effort above a certain capability (or resources like compute) threshold will need to be subject to an international authority that can inspect systems, require audits, test for compliance with safety standards, place restrictions on degrees of deployment and levels of security, etc. Tracking compute and energy usage could go a long way, and give us some hope this idea could actually be implementable. As a first step, companies could voluntarily agree to begin implementing elements of what such an agency might one day require, and as a second, individual countries could implement it. It would be important that such an agency focus on reducing existential risk and not issues that should be left to individual countries, such as defining what an AI should be allowed to say.
AI Verified source (May 22, 2023)
Like Share on X 11mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified OpenAI proposes an international authority able to inspect systems and require audits above a capability or compute threshold. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Unverifiable The statement proposes an international authority modeled on the IAEA but does not establish that it would be UN-led. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified OpenAI's May 22, 2023 Governance of superintelligence post contains this organizational statement verbatim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago
Disputed The passage is real and appears verbatim in OpenAI’s article “Governance of superintelligence” (the submitted /blog URL redirects to the canonical /index/ page), and the page date is May 22, 2023. However, the article is not authored by “OpenAI”; the page lists three individual authors: Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever. Because the source has multiple individual authors, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote. ([openai.com](https://openai.com/blog/governance-of-superintelligence)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2mo ago
Disputed The passage appears verbatim in OpenAI’s article “Governance of superintelligence,” published May 22, 2023, at lines 48–49. However, the page credits the authors as Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever, not “OpenAI,” so the quote is real but the attribution given here is not exact. ([openai.com](https://openai.com/blog/governance-of-superintelligence)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2mo ago
AI Verified OpenAI URL is blocked from WebFetch, but search results confirmed the quote is from OpenAI's "Governance of superintelligence" blog post (May 22, 2023) by Altman, Brockman, Sutskever. The quote text matches exactly. However, the quote was incorrectly attached to the statement "Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN" - the quote is actually about an IAEA-like inspection/regulatory body, NOT a CERN-like research institute. I removed the quote-statement association. The quote remains accurate in content and attribution. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 3mo ago
replying to OpenAI