Comment by Matt Cagle

ACLU tech and civil liberties attorney
As Santa Cruz rightly recognized, predictive policing and facial recognition are dangerous, racially biased technologies that should never be used by our government. [...] Lawmakers across the country have a responsibility to step up and dismantle surveillance systems that have long been used to repress activism, target communities of color, and invade people's private lives.
AI Verified source (2020)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly addresses predictive policing and clearly supports banning it, stating it is a dangerous, racially biased technology that 'should never be used by our government.' Although it also mentions facial recognition and broader surveillance, its position on banning predictive policing is explicit. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says predictive policing is a "dangerous, racially biased" technology that "should never be used by our government," which clearly supports banning it. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports the statement: it says predictive policing and facial recognition "should never be used by our government" and calls on lawmakers to "dismantle surveillance systems." That implies support for banning government use of AI-driven surveillance, including mass surveillance of citizens. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says predictive policing and facial recognition "should never be used by our government" and that lawmakers should "dismantle surveillance systems," which clearly supports banning government use of AI surveillance. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly opposes government use of AI surveillance technologies: it says facial recognition and predictive policing 'should never be used by our government' and calls on lawmakers to 'dismantle surveillance systems,' implying support for banning AI-based mass surveillance. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports the statement: it says predictive policing and facial recognition "should never be used by our government" and calls on lawmakers to "dismantle surveillance systems." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The Thomson Reuters Foundation article dated June 24, 2020 at the provided URL contains both sentences verbatim. It attributes the first to “Matt Cagle, a lawyer with the ACLU” and the second to “Cagle said in emailed comments,” confirming the quote is authentic and correctly attributed to Matt Cagle in 2020. ([news.trust.org](https://news.trust.org/item/20200624172955-lhprd)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is from Matt Cagle (Senior Staff Attorney at ACLU of Northern California) commenting on Santa Cruz's June 2020 ban on predictive policing — the first US city to do so. Search results confirm the verbatim quote: "predictive policing and facial recognition are dangerous, racially-biased technologies that should never be used by our government." The vote "for" on "Ban predictive policing" directly matches. Despite the 2020 date, the quote remains canonical and Cagle's position is unchanged in his more recent 2024 ACLU work. Source URL (news.trust.org) could not be fetched but content is confirmed. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Matt Cagle