We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM)
EU group of chief scientific advisors
At the time, the Advisors recommended that this should be a distributed institution, not a single centralised organisation.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote is from the EU Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM) page "CERN for AI: the devil is in the detail, say science advisors". Multiple corroborating sources confirm SAM/the EU Chief Scientific Advisors recommended a "European Distributed Institute for AI in Science" (EDIRAS), explicitly arguing it should be a distributed institution rather than a single centralised organisation. The "against" vote on "Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN" is defensible: while SAM supports the general concept of a major AI research institute, they explicitly reject the centralised CERN-like model in favor of a distributed one — the statement specifies "similar to CERN" which implies centralisation. Source URL returned 403; verification relies on multiple corroborating search results including sciencebusiness.net and scientificadvice.eu summaries.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 3d ago
replying to Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM)