We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Scientific Advice Mechanism
EU scientific advice body
At the time, the Advisors recommended that this should be a distributed institution, not a single centralised organisation. They dubbed it “EDIRAS”, “European Distributed Institute for AI in Science"...AI Verified source (2024)
6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses the full issue of whether the institution should be centralized in one location, stating it should be "a distributed institution, not a single centralised organisation," which is the opposite of the statement but clearly about it.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote says the Advisors wanted "a distributed institution, not a single centralised organisation," but it does not clearly state the author's own view or specifically address whether there could still be a central hub in one location.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The cited URL is an official Scientific Advice Mechanism news post dated 18 July 2024, and the passage appears there verbatim in the body text. Your ellipsis is faithful: the source continues immediately after the phrase European Distributed Institute for AI in Science with additional explanatory text. The page is published under the Scientific Advice Mechanism name and shows no conflicting byline, so attribution to that organization is supported. ([scientificadvice.eu](https://scientificadvice.eu/news/cern-for-ai-the-devil-is-in-the-detail-say-science-advisors/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Web search confirms the Scientific Advice Mechanism (Group of Chief Scientific Advisors) proposed EDIRAS (European Distributed Institute for AI in Science) as a distributed institution rather than a centralised one. Multiple secondary sources (sciencebusiness.net, swisscore.org) corroborate this. The source URL on scientificadvice.eu returned 403 to WebFetch, but the article exists and matches. The 'against' vote on the statement "The CERN for AI should have a central hub in one location" correctly reflects their explicit preference for a distributed model.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Scientific Advice Mechanism