We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Mark MacCarthy
Tech policy scholar
For instance, Meta should be liable if Meta AI, its chatbot, provides advice, guidance, or recommendations that would create liability if provided by a human.AI Verified source (Aug 20, 2025)
4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Directly relevant: the source frames chatbot providers as responsible for their public-facing systems, and this quote specifically says Meta should be liable when its deployed chatbot gives harmful advice that would create liability if a human gave it. That is a concrete, narrower instance of the complete statement, so a determinable stance is clearly signaled. ([techpolicy.press](https://www.techpolicy.press/ai-companies-should-be-liable-for-the-illegal-conduct-of-ai-chatbots/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote directly supports the statement: it says "Meta should be liable" if its deployed chatbot gives advice or recommendations that would create liability if a human gave them. That is a clear pro-liability position, even if framed through this specific Meta AI example.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the Tech Policy Press page for “AI Companies Should be Liable for the Illegal Conduct of AI Chatbots” shows the byline “Mark MacCarthy / Aug 20, 2025,” and the article text contains the exact quoted sentence verbatim. The stored author, date, quote text, and source URL match the fetchable source. ([techpolicy.press](https://www.techpolicy.press/ai-companies-should-be-liable-for-the-illegal-conduct-of-ai-chatbots/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
replying to Mark MacCarthy