We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Marc Rotenberg
Founder and Executive Director, Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP); former president of EPIC
The key risk is not only "runaway" AI, but the quiet normalization of systems that undermine human dignity, due process, and equal protection because no one is clearly accountable when things go wrong. [...] The central question will be whether governments are willing to prohibit certain applications—such as biometric mass surveillance and autonomous weapons—or whether they will settle for voluntary codes of conduct. [...] One of the most important indicators is whether countries establish genuinely independent oversight bodies with the authority, expertise, and resources to scrutinize powerful AI systems.AI Verified source (2026)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly points to support for prohibiting autonomous weapons, contrasting prohibition with merely accepting voluntary codes. Because banning autonomous weapons necessarily includes banning autonomous lethal weapons, it establishes a supportive stance on the statement.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Unverifiable
Vote answer comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote says the issue is "whether governments are willing to prohibit certain applications—such as ... autonomous weapons—or whether they will settle for voluntary codes of conduct," which raises prohibition as a question but does not clearly state the author’s own position.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. In TechPolicy.Press’s January 6, 2026 article “Expert Predictions on What’s at Stake in AI Policy in 2026,” the section headed “Marc Rotenberg—Founder, Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP)” contains these sentences verbatim, with the user’s [...] matching omitted intervening text. The only minor difference is that the source includes “For me,” before the last sentence and uses typographic quotation marks, which does not change the attribution or substance. ([techpolicy.press](https://www.techpolicy.press/expert-predictions-on-whats-at-stake-in-ai-policy-in-2026/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
AI Unverifiable
Unable to verify. The source URL (techpolicy.press/expert-predictions-on-whats-at-stake-in-ai-policy-in-2026) returns HTTP 403 to automated fetching. Unlike other quotes I was able to corroborate verbatim via web search, the distinctive phrases here ("the quiet normalization of systems that undermine human dignity, due process, and equal protection"; "genuinely independent oversight bodies with the authority, expertise, and resources to scrutinize powerful AI systems") are not indexed in any reachable search result, so I could not independently confirm the exact wording. Supporting context is consistent: the TechPolicy.Press article "Expert Predictions on What's at Stake in AI Policy in 2026" genuinely exists, Marc Rotenberg (CAIDP founder, former EPIC president) is a confirmed contributor, the year 2026 is current, and the quote's content (opposing biometric mass surveillance and autonomous weapons, favoring independent oversight) aligns with his documented positions and with the "for" vote on "Ban governments from using AI to conduct mass surveillance of citizens." However, because the source is blocked and the exact quote could not be positively confirmed, I am marking this ai_unverifiable rather than verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12d ago
replying to Marc Rotenberg