Comment by Dario Amodei

But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly condemns AI-driven mass domestic surveillance as incompatible with democratic values and says any current legality is due to laws lagging behind AI capabilities, which strongly implies support for banning governments from using AI for mass surveillance of citizens. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote clearly condemns "mass domestic surveillance" as "incompatible with democratic values" and says its legality exists "only because the law has not yet caught up," implying support for making it illegal. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly condemns AI-driven mass surveillance as "incompatible with democratic values" and says its current legality exists only because "the law has not yet caught up," which strongly implies support for banning the use of AI for mass surveillance. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote clearly condemns AI mass surveillance as "incompatible with democratic values" and says it is legal only because "the law has not yet caught up," which supports banning it. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Anthropic’s page at the supplied URL is titled “Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War,” is dated Feb 26, 2026, and contains the exact passage beginning “But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance...” and ending “...the rapidly growing capabilities of AI.” The stored quote text, attribution to Dario Amodei, date, and source URL all match. ([anthropic.com](https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Disputed The official Anthropic post, “Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War” (Feb. 26, 2026), does attribute these sentences to Dario Amodei and contains them at the cited URL. However, the submitted quote is not verbatim/faithful as written: the source order is “Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal...” The submitted version reverses the first two sentences, so it is materially altered. ([anthropic.com](https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Quote attributed to Dario Amodei (CEO, Anthropic): "AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. [...] Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI." The source URL (anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed both the content and the attribution: the page is titled "Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War," and multiple outlets (The Hill, Daily Nous, EA Forum, Computerworld) confirm Anthropic/Amodei stated that AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious novel risks and that using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. Author attribution correct (Amodei's signed statement); source is the primary official statement. Year 2026 (Feb) correct and relevant. The position supports banning AI for mass domestic surveillance, consistent with statement "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance" (author already has a vote on this statement). Verified. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 1mo ago
replying to Dario Amodei