The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) poses no credible risk of destroying Earth by creating a microscopic black hole

Key insights

Across the quotes, the same safety conclusion is reached through different mechanisms: inability to create a dangerous black hole, immediate evaporation, cosmic-ray precedent, or weak gravity.
Official CERN sources and experiment collaborations appear alongside outside physicists, science communicators, fact-checkers, and general news outlets, and they largely use similar safety framing.
Many quotes answer black-hole fears together with claims about portals, wormholes, timelines, or damaged reality, showing that the risk debate is often bundled with broader conspiracy narratives.
Several sources explicitly distinguish hypothetical microscopic collider objects from the massive astrophysical black holes familiar from popular culture.
The more cautious quotes tend to frame danger only as an 'in principle' or highly speculative scenario, not as a credible present risk under LHC conditions.

Arguments for

Insufficient collision energy

Several quotes say current accelerators are nowhere near the energy needed to create a dangerous black hole, and some state that the LHC simply cannot make one from its proton collisions at all. In this view, the basic physical precondition for an Earth-threatening event is missing.

Current particle accelerators are nowhere near the energy scale needed to create a dangerous black hole.

Don Lincoln · Jun 3, 2026 · full quote
The LHC gives a lot of energy to particles, but nowhere close to producing a black hole. The LHC simply can’t do that.

Dr. Alfredo Carpineti · Mar 12, 2026 · full quote
CERN's equipment began operating in March, a month before the eclipse, and the technology is nowhere near strong enough to open a portal or a black hole.

Gabrielle Settles · Apr 5, 2024 · full quote
At least in the energies we have with the LHC, the Large Hadron Collider, we cannot throw particles together with enough force to cause tiny black holes.

Delilah Gates · Jun 10, 2021 · full quote
So there's no possible way we're gonna make a black hole out of two protons at the Large Hadron Collider.

James Beacham · Oct 28, 2021 · full quote

Immediate evaporation

Another common argument is that even if speculative microscopic black holes were produced, they would be extremely tiny, unstable, and would disintegrate or evaporate almost immediately, often described as around 10^-27 seconds. Because they would vanish before accreting matter, these sources say they could not cause macroscopic harm.

According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, it is impossible for LHC to produce black holes. However, some speculative theories predict the production of microscopic black holes. All these theories predict that these particles would disintegrate immediately. Black holes, theref…

CERN · Jul 8, 2026 · full quote
If micro black holes do appear they would disintegrate extremely rapidly, in around 10^{-27} seconds, as they decay into Standard Model or SUSY particles, producing many jets and leptons.

CMS Experiment · Jul 11, 2026 · full quote
These tiny black holes would emit all their energy - or "evaporate" - almost instantly through Hawking radiation, releasing a distinctive burst of particles that detectors like CMS at CERN could observe.

CMS Collaboration · Dec 4, 2025 · full quote
Quantum Black Holes are harmless for the environment: they will decay within less than 10⁻²⁷ seconds.

Albert De Roeck · Jun 17, 2021 · full quote
Any black holes that could be produced by the LHC would be microscopic, and they would immediately evaporate since they are no longer stable.

Dejan Stojkovic · Nov 10, 2022 · full quote
Ces collisions de protons au LHC font des particules excessivement légères, et donc elles créeraient un trou noir de la masse qu'elles ont, c'est-à-dire infiniment léger. Il ne pourrait pas attirer quoi que ce soit, il serait moins attractif qu'un caillou posé par terre, et il ne…

Stéphanie Roccia · Jul 21, 2022 · full quote

Natural-collision precedent

Many quotes argue that nature already produces similar or higher-energy collisions through cosmic rays striking Earth and the atmosphere. Since Earth and other astronomical objects have persisted through vast numbers of such events, these sources treat collider doomsday fears as inconsistent with what is already observed.

Physicists at the time published safety assessments addressing the concern directly, arguing that collisions of similar or greater energy already occur naturally and constantly from cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.

Natalija Ugrina · Jul 8, 2026 · full quote
El universo produce más de 10 millones de millones de experimentos similares a los del LHC por segundo. Si esas colisiones fueran peligrosas, esto contradeciría lo que observamos, ya que las estrellas, las galaxias y la Tierra continúan existiendo.

Chequeado · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
“Earth survived these numerous impacts throughout its 4.5-billion-year history, implying that we should not fear a black hole doomsday ... If any microscopic black holes had been produced by cosmic-ray impacts on Earth, these black holes must have evaporated rapidly without causi…

Avi Loeb · Feb 8, 2026 · full quote
If this generated dangerous black holes, then the Earth has already been zapped by much higher-energy collisions from cosmic rays billions of times.

Elliott Lipeles · Jul 13, 2022 · full quote
No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.

From Quarks to Quasars · Jul 2, 2026 · full quote
“These collisions are actually happening in nature all around us all the time. ... If they were creating black holes on these other natural collisions, then we could have expected to have seen some kind of impact from that.”

Gene Van Buren · Feb 9, 2026 · full quote

Negligible gravitational effects

A separate line of argument focuses on what a microscopic black hole would physically be like: very small in mass, weak in gravitational influence, and not an object that automatically 'sucks in' surrounding matter. On this view, even a formed object would not behave like the popular image of a planet-eating cosmic black hole.

Black holes don't suck in other matter. From far enough away, their gravitational effects are just like those of other objects of the same mass.

NASA Science · Mar 11, 2026 · full quote
If you took the Earth and could squash it down into a black hole, it would make a black hole the size of a tennis ball. You need a lot of material to get anything you could actually see and observe.

Robert Massey · Mar 18, 2026 · full quote
If you replaced the Sun with a black hole of the same mass, the solar system would get a lot colder, but the planets would stay in their orbits.

Jeanette Kazmierczak · Mar 11, 2026 · full quote
Sarebbe probabilmente di massa così bassa che la sua influenza gravitazionale sarebbe relativamente piccola. In realtà non divorerebbe così tanta materia.

Eliot Quataert · Feb 21, 2023 · full quote
Microscopic black holes differ significantly from their cosmic counterparts. They would have minimal gravitational effects and pose no threat to Earth.

Factual America · Aug 23, 2024 · full quote
Black holes, generally speaking, are awful at consuming matter.

Doug Gobielle · 2022 · full quote

Middle ground

Speculative edge cases

A few quotes acknowledge that black-hole production can be discussed 'in principle' or under extra assumptions about dimensions, Hawking radiation, or other speculative conditions. But these remarks still describe the real-world LHC case as unlikely, impractical, or not something people should presently worry about.

“If reality has more than four dimensions, and if hawking radiation doesn't exist, and if CERN created a black hole with no charge ... then yes, CERN could create the black hole that would consume the world ... But it probably won't ever happen.”

Alex McColgan · Jan 15, 2026 · full quote
In principle, yes. In practice, no. That's what you need to do to ensure these things are safe.

Neil deGrasse Tyson · Mar 5, 2024 · full quote
CERN insists its research, including that of microscopic black holes, is perfectly safe, but some theorists believe it could cause a collapse of the entire universe.

HowStuffWorks · Mar 7, 2024 · full quote
Some worry it could destroy the world by creating mini black holes, strange matter, or even vacuum bubbles. But experts say there's no real risk of that, or at least, it's extremely unlikely.

Bright Side · Feb 10, 2026 · full quote
Si en algún momento somos capaces de generar un microagujero negro, el mundo no se destruirá, pero habrá que sentarse a tomar aliento.

Óscar del Barco Novillo · Feb 6, 2024 · full quote

In the provided quotes, the discussion is dominated by sources rejecting an Earth-destroying black-hole scenario at the LHC. They differ mainly in explanation: some say the collider lacks the necessary energy, while others emphasize rapid evaporation, natural cosmic-ray precedents, or the weak pull of microscopic objects. Only a small subset discusses highly conditional theoretical edge cases, and no direct sourced cluster in this sample argues that the risk is presently credible.

Cast Your Vote:

Results (183 votes):

Total (183 votes)

For 178 (97%) Abstain 1 (1%) Against 4 (2%)

For (177)

Times of India
Indian news outlet that in July 2026 described CERN black-hole conspiracy claims as sensational internet conspiracies rather than real risk.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Despite years of sensational internet conspiracies suggesting it could create black holes or portals, the shutdown is simply routine.
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
CMS Experiment
Large general-purpose particle physics experiment at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

If micro black holes do appear they would disintegrate extremely rapidly, in around 10^{-27} seconds, as they decay into Standard Model or SUSY particles, producing many jets and leptons.
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
TOI Tech Desk
Technology desk of The Times of India covering science and technology news.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No black hole. No portal. No end of days. Just a very long, very expensive maintenance window.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Imagen Poblana
Mexican news outlet covering current affairs, science, and education news.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Los especialistas han rechazado de forma reiterada estas afirmaciones. El propio CERN explica que no hay evidencia científica que vincule el funcionamiento del LHC con desastres naturales o fenómenos extraordinarios. Respecto a la teoría de los aguje...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Daniel Ceballos
Journalist at MDZ Online covering science and technology trends.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Los físicos señalan que, incluso en escenarios teóricos, cualquier agujero negro microscópico generado por colisiones de partículas sería extremadamente inestable y desaparecería casi de inmediato. No hay pruebas de que el LHC represente un riesgo pa...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Natalija Ugrina
Writer covering science-related conspiracy claims and public science communication.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Physicists at the time published safety assessments addressing the concern directly, arguing that collisions of similar or greater energy already occur naturally and constantly from cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Martín Nicolás Parolari
Journalist at Gizmodo en Español covering science and technology.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Si ese tipo de eventos fuera realmente peligroso, ni la Tierra ni el Sol habrían sobrevivido miles de millones de años.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
César Eduardo Torres Vargas
Journalist covering science and technology for Merca2.0.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Incluso en el escenario hipotético de que se generara un microagujero negro, este sería extremadamente pequeño e inestable, por lo que desaparecería casi de inmediato sin representar ningún peligro.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
CERN
European particle physics laboratory

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, it is impossible for LHC to produce black holes. However, some speculative theories predict the production of microscopic black holes. All these theories predict that these particles would disintegrate im...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Galaxies

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Despite common misconceptions, CERN says the collider poses no danger to Earth. Similar high-energy particle collisions occur naturally in our atmosphere every second when cosmic rays strike the planet.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chequeado
Argentine fact-checking outlet covering misinformation and public-interest reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

El universo produce más de 10 millones de millones de experimentos similares a los del LHC por segundo. Si esas colisiones fueran peligrosas, esto contradeciría lo que observamos, ya que las estrellas, las galaxias y la Tierra continúan existiendo.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
NL TV JAG
Writer at nuevolaredo.tv covering international and science-related news.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

La comunidad científica ha descartado ese escenario desde hace años al señalar que las condiciones de operación del LHC no representan un peligro para el planeta.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Eugenia Leis Montero
Journalist at Chequeado covering fact-checking and misinformation.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Especialistas y el propio CERN señalaron a Chequeado que no existe evidencia científica que respalde estas afirmaciones.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Brenda Barragán
Journalist at El Informador covering science and international news.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

El apagado del Gran Colisionador de Hadrones no responde a una emergencia ni a un riesgo para la humanidad, sino a una etapa clave dentro de uno de los proyectos científicos más importantes del mundo.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Andrew Paul
Staff writer at Popular Science covering science and technology news.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Apocalyptic conspiracy theories to the contrary, it expanded on key concepts in quantum physics, while charting a path forward for researchers around the world.
AI Verified source (Jul 5, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
statuslink
Media channel publishing explainer videos on science and current topics.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Scientists explained that the tiny black holes predicted by some theories, if they could even be created, would disappear almost instantly and pose no danger.
AI Verified source (Jul 4, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Hashem Al-Ghaili

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

And for those harboring doomsday anxieties, CERN assures the public that these high-energy smashes pose zero risk to Earth - nature already runs millions of similar high-energy collisions every second in our atmosphere via cosmic rays.
AI Verified source (Jul 3, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
IFLScience
Science news outlet that published a 2026 article dismissing CERN time-altering and world-destroying conspiracy claims.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Particle collisions are not affecting you. The usual claim is that it will destroy the world, but natural accelerators can produce particles with energies 100,000 times higher than collisions at the LHC.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
From Quarks to Quasars
Science page that posted a 2026 explainer saying the upgraded LHC is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Josh Dinner
Space journalist credited on a July 2026 Space.com post rejecting claims that CERN destroyed reality.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No credible evidence supports the idea that CERN destroyed reality. The physics does not support the conspiracy claims.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Space.com
Space news outlet that posted a July 2026 explainer rejecting claims that CERN destroyed reality.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No credible evidence supports the idea that CERN destroyed reality.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
The Secrets Of The Universe
Science page that posted July 2026 LHC shutdown and anti-conspiracy explanations based on CERN's Long Shutdown 3 announcement.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Carla Antonella Gatti
LinkedIn user whose July 2026 post repeated CERN's claim that the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
ScienceNaturePage
Science news account that posted a 2026 summary explaining why CERN's collider poses no risk to Earth.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

“CERN assures the public that these high-energy smashes pose zero risk to Earth—nature already runs millions of similar high-energy collisions every second in our atmosphere via cosmic rays.”
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Dave Barney
CERN physicist quoted in 2026 about collider conspiracy theories and portals claims.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

“That is very different from opening a doorway, or a wormhole, or a portal into another dimension. We can’t do that. We’re not all-powerful.”
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Steven Goldfarb
Physicist and CERN communicator quoted about LHC conspiracy theories in 2026.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

“Unfortunately, the phrase ‘black hole’ fueled a lot of conspiracy theories. In reality, these would have been nothing like the enormous black holes made from thousands or millions of suns, and they would never have posed a danger.”
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Brandon Vigliarolo
Science and technology journalist at The Register.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

It's not being turned off for fear of the world being sucked into some sort of cosmic anomaly - it's getting a major upgrade.
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Edd Gent
British freelance science writer covering technology, engineering, bioscience, and science policy for Live Science and other outlets.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Creating even a microscopic black hole or wormhole would require an accelerator the size of the whole universe, say researchers.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Diario UNO
Spanish-language news outlet publishing science explainers and reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

La respuesta corta es tranquilizadora: según el conocimiento científico actual, no existe evidencia de que el CERN pueda generar un agujero negro peligroso.
AI Verified source (Jun 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Redacción de UNO
Diario UNO's editorial newsroom, which published a 2026 science explainer on CERN and Large Hadron Collider black-hole risk.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

La respuesta corta es tranquilizadora: según el conocimiento científico actual, no existe evidencia de que el CERN pueda generar un agujero negro peligroso.
AI Verified source (Jun 6, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Abstain (1)

Loading more opinions...

Against (4)

Loading more opinions...

Back