We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) poses no credible risk of destroying Earth by creating a microscopic black hole
Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends
Cast your vote:
Results (183 votes):
Total
(183 votes)
For 178 (97%)
Abstain 1 (1%)
Against 4 (2%)
·
For (177)
-
Times of IndiaIndian news outlet that in July 2026 described CERN black-hole conspiracy claims as sensational internet conspiracies rather than real risk.votes For and says:
Despite years of sensational internet conspiracies suggesting it could create black holes or portals, the shutdown is simply routine.
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
CMS ExperimentLarge general-purpose particle physics experiment at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.votes For and says:
If micro black holes do appear they would disintegrate extremely rapidly, in around 10^{-27} seconds, as they decay into Standard Model or SUSY particles, producing many jets and leptons.
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
TOI Tech DeskTechnology desk of The Times of India covering science and technology news.votes For and says:
No black hole. No portal. No end of days. Just a very long, very expensive maintenance window.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Imagen PoblanaMexican news outlet covering current affairs, science, and education news.votes For and says:
Los especialistas han rechazado de forma reiterada estas afirmaciones. El propio CERN explica que no hay evidencia científica que vincule el funcionamiento del LHC con desastres naturales o fenómenos extraordinarios. Respecto a la teoría de los aguje...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daniel CeballosJournalist at MDZ Online covering science and technology trends.votes For and says:
Los físicos señalan que, incluso en escenarios teóricos, cualquier agujero negro microscópico generado por colisiones de partículas sería extremadamente inestable y desaparecería casi de inmediato. No hay pruebas de que el LHC represente un riesgo pa...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Natalija UgrinaWriter covering science-related conspiracy claims and public science communication.votes For and says:
Physicists at the time published safety assessments addressing the concern directly, arguing that collisions of similar or greater energy already occur naturally and constantly from cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Martín Nicolás ParolariJournalist at Gizmodo en Español covering science and technology.votes For and says:
Si ese tipo de eventos fuera realmente peligroso, ni la Tierra ni el Sol habrían sobrevivido miles de millones de años.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
César Eduardo Torres VargasJournalist covering science and technology for Merca2.0.votes For and says:
Incluso en el escenario hipotético de que se generara un microagujero negro, este sería extremadamente pequeño e inestable, por lo que desaparecería casi de inmediato sin representar ningún peligro.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
CERNEuropean particle physics laboratoryvotes For and says:
According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, it is impossible for LHC to produce black holes. However, some speculative theories predict the production of microscopic black holes. All these theories predict that these particles would disintegrate im...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Despite common misconceptions, CERN says the collider poses no danger to Earth. Similar high-energy particle collisions occur naturally in our atmosphere every second when cosmic rays strike the planet.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ChequeadoArgentine fact-checking outlet covering misinformation and public-interest reporting.votes For and says:
El universo produce más de 10 millones de millones de experimentos similares a los del LHC por segundo. Si esas colisiones fueran peligrosas, esto contradeciría lo que observamos, ya que las estrellas, las galaxias y la Tierra continúan existiendo.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
NL TV JAGWriter at nuevolaredo.tv covering international and science-related news.votes For and says:
La comunidad científica ha descartado ese escenario desde hace años al señalar que las condiciones de operación del LHC no representan un peligro para el planeta.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Eugenia Leis MonteroJournalist at Chequeado covering fact-checking and misinformation.votes For and says:
Especialistas y el propio CERN señalaron a Chequeado que no existe evidencia científica que respalde estas afirmaciones.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brenda BarragánJournalist at El Informador covering science and international news.votes For and says:
El apagado del Gran Colisionador de Hadrones no responde a una emergencia ni a un riesgo para la humanidad, sino a una etapa clave dentro de uno de los proyectos científicos más importantes del mundo.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew PaulStaff writer at Popular Science covering science and technology news.votes For and says:
Apocalyptic conspiracy theories to the contrary, it expanded on key concepts in quantum physics, while charting a path forward for researchers around the world.
AI Verified source (Jul 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
statuslinkMedia channel publishing explainer videos on science and current topics.votes For and says:
Scientists explained that the tiny black holes predicted by some theories, if they could even be created, would disappear almost instantly and pose no danger.
AI Verified source (Jul 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
And for those harboring doomsday anxieties, CERN assures the public that these high-energy smashes pose zero risk to Earth - nature already runs millions of similar high-energy collisions every second in our atmosphere via cosmic rays.
AI Verified source (Jul 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
IFLScienceScience news outlet that published a 2026 article dismissing CERN time-altering and world-destroying conspiracy claims.votes For and says:
Particle collisions are not affecting you. The usual claim is that it will destroy the world, but natural accelerators can produce particles with energies 100,000 times higher than collisions at the LHC.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
From Quarks to QuasarsScience page that posted a 2026 explainer saying the upgraded LHC is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine.votes For and says:
No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Josh DinnerSpace journalist credited on a July 2026 Space.com post rejecting claims that CERN destroyed reality.votes For and says:
No credible evidence supports the idea that CERN destroyed reality. The physics does not support the conspiracy claims.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Space.comSpace news outlet that posted a July 2026 explainer rejecting claims that CERN destroyed reality.votes For and says:
No credible evidence supports the idea that CERN destroyed reality.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The Secrets Of The UniverseScience page that posted July 2026 LHC shutdown and anti-conspiracy explanations based on CERN's Long Shutdown 3 announcement.votes For and says:
No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Carla Antonella GattiLinkedIn user whose July 2026 post repeated CERN's claim that the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine.votes For and says:
No, CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine. Nature already performs millions of LHC-like particle collisions every second through cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ScienceNaturePageScience news account that posted a 2026 summary explaining why CERN's collider poses no risk to Earth.votes For and says:
“CERN assures the public that these high-energy smashes pose zero risk to Earth—nature already runs millions of similar high-energy collisions every second in our atmosphere via cosmic rays.”
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dave BarneyCERN physicist quoted in 2026 about collider conspiracy theories and portals claims.votes For and says:
“That is very different from opening a doorway, or a wormhole, or a portal into another dimension. We can’t do that. We’re not all-powerful.”
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Steven GoldfarbPhysicist and CERN communicator quoted about LHC conspiracy theories in 2026.votes For and says:
“Unfortunately, the phrase ‘black hole’ fueled a lot of conspiracy theories. In reality, these would have been nothing like the enormous black holes made from thousands or millions of suns, and they would never have posed a danger.”
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brandon VigliaroloScience and technology journalist at The Register.votes For and says:
It's not being turned off for fear of the world being sucked into some sort of cosmic anomaly - it's getting a major upgrade.
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Edd GentBritish freelance science writer covering technology, engineering, bioscience, and science policy for Live Science and other outlets.votes For and says:
Creating even a microscopic black hole or wormhole would require an accelerator the size of the whole universe, say researchers.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Diario UNOSpanish-language news outlet publishing science explainers and reporting.votes For and says:
La respuesta corta es tranquilizadora: según el conocimiento científico actual, no existe evidencia de que el CERN pueda generar un agujero negro peligroso.
AI Verified source (Jun 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Redacción de UNODiario UNO's editorial newsroom, which published a 2026 science explainer on CERN and Large Hadron Collider black-hole risk.votes For and says:
La respuesta corta es tranquilizadora: según el conocimiento científico actual, no existe evidencia de que el CERN pueda generar un agujero negro peligroso.
AI Verified source (Jun 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Don LincolnParticle physicist at Fermilab and science communicator.votes For and says:
Current particle accelerators are nowhere near the energy scale needed to create a dangerous black hole.
AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Surveee.orgScience and culture page that posted a 2026 explainer rejecting claims that the Large Hadron Collider could create a dangerous black hole.votes For and says:
Any black hole produced would be smaller than a subatomic particle and vanish in a fraction of a second. Other claims are pure fiction.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sabrina PasterskiTheoretical physicist who commented on CERN black-hole conspiracy claims in 2026.votes For and says:
“They’re not trying to. ... I wish it were that fun. I wish it were that risky. ... you’re not going to be able to traverse anything.”
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Camilla PiantaScience writer for the Valle d'Aosta Astronomical Observatory's Sci-fi Astronomy series.votes For and says:
In scientific reality, however, there is no risk of such an apocalyptic scenario occurring.
AI Verified source (May 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Niamh KingsleyWriter publishing LinkedIn explainers on science and technology topics, including CERN and particle physics.votes For and says:
The paper explains why we definitely don't need to worry about cosmic-ray collisions, vacuum bubbles, magnetic monopoles, microscopic black holes, or strangelets.
AI Verified source (May 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Redacción de NCYTEditorial newsroom of Noticias de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (NCYT/Amazings), a Spanish-language science and technology publication.votes For and says:
La respuesta corta es no. Incluso en el hipotético caso de que un colisionador de partículas produjera una singularidad microscópica, las leyes de la termodinámica predicen su desaparición inmediata.
AI Verified source (May 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
«Ah, o CERN vai abrir um buraco negro» Infelizmente não. Não há energia suficiente para isso.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Science ExploristScience page that posted a 2026 explainer saying there is no evidence the LHC has changed the past or fractured reality.votes For and says:
That does not mean the machine is capable of rewriting history, merging timelines, or damaging reality itself. There is no scientific evidence showing that the LHC has changed the past or fractured our universe.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ATLAS Experiment at CERNOfficial CERN experiment page that posted 2026 updates comparing LHC work with naturally occurring cosmic-ray events.votes For and says:
Scientists from the ATLAS Collaboration are now recreating cosmic ray events at the Large Hadron Collider by colliding protons with oxygen ions for the very first time. This new approach turns ATLAS into a cosmic-ray laboratory.
AI Verified source (Apr 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New ScientistScience publication that posted a 2026 explainer on the LHC shutdown and why it poses no danger to Earth.votes For and says:
“And for those harboring doomsday anxieties, CERN assures the public that these high-energy smashes pose zero risk to Earth.”
AI Verified source (Apr 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Robert MasseyAstronomer and science communicator at the Royal Astronomical Society.votes For and says:
If you took the Earth and could squash it down into a black hole, it would make a black hole the size of a tennis ball. You need a lot of material to get anything you could actually see and observe.
AI Verified source (Mar 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Becky SmethurstAstrophysicist and science communicator who discussed black-hole safety at the LHC in 2026.votes For and says:
“We don't have the technology to do that. But I think it is worth saying that if you could do this, it would be safe.”
AI Verified source (Mar 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dr. Alfredo CarpinetiAstrophysicist and Space & Physics Editor at IFLScience.votes For and says:
The LHC gives a lot of energy to particles, but nowhere close to producing a black hole. The LHC simply can’t do that.
AI Verified source (Mar 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeanette KazmierczakNASA science writer and page editor credited on NASA's Black Hole Basics explainer.votes For and says:
If you replaced the Sun with a black hole of the same mass, the solar system would get a lot colder, but the planets would stay in their orbits.
AI Verified source (Mar 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
NASA ScienceNASA's science editorial platform publishing official explainers and research updates across astronomy and space science.votes For and says:
Black holes don't suck in other matter. From far enough away, their gravitational effects are just like those of other objects of the same mass.
AI Verified source (Mar 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ethan SiegelAstrophysicist and science writer who publishes Starts With A Bang! on Medium and Big Think.votes For and says:
Just as we knew that a common fear from 2008, that "the LHC could create black holes that destroy the Earth," was unfounded, we also know that any particle physics experiment we perform on Earth won't give rise to any of those dire consequences that ...
more AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
PBS Space TimePublic science series explaining astrophysics, cosmology, and particle physics.votes For and says:
Some people worried that the large hadron collider would smash particles together so hard it would make black holes that would swallow the earth, open wormholes to other dimensions etc. It didn't and won't.
AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elena BuratinScience journalist at Geopop covering physics and particle accelerator topics.votes For and says:
Gli acceleratori come il CERN (il più potente del mondo) non possono generare buchi neri pericolosi.
AI Verified source (Feb 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Interesting EngineeringTechnology and science outlet that posted 2026 updates about LHC upgrades and the High-Luminosity LHC.votes For and says:
The upcoming Long Shutdown 3 will transform the LHC over four intensive years, and CERN says the upgraded collider is no more likely to destroy the universe than the original machine.
AI Verified source (Feb 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bright SideScience and explainer media channel that publishes educational videos on space, technology, and everyday science.votes For and says:
Some worry it could destroy the world by creating mini black holes, strange matter, or even vacuum bubbles. But experts say there's no real risk of that, or at least, it's extremely unlikely.
AI Verified source (Feb 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Flora LichtmanScience journalist and host at Science Friday.votes For and says:
Nature is actually doing this all the time, and it has been for millennia, and it's not a problem for us.
AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gene Van BurenBrookhaven nuclear physicist who discussed collider black-hole fears in a 2026 Science Friday interview.votes For and says:
“These collisions are actually happening in nature all around us all the time. ... If they were creating black holes on these other natural collisions, then we could have expected to have seen some kind of impact from that.”
AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Avi LoebHarvard astrophysicist who wrote in 2026 that cosmic rays already surpass collider black-hole scenarios.votes For and says:
“Earth survived these numerous impacts throughout its 4.5-billion-year history, implying that we should not fear a black hole doomsday ... If any microscopic black holes had been produced by cosmic-ray impacts on Earth, these black holes must have ev...
more AI Verified source (Feb 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SpaceAstrumSpace-science page that posted a 2026 explainer discussing why the Large Hadron Collider is not a credible Earth-destroying black-hole risk.votes For and says:
The creation of black holes at the Large Hadron Collider is very unlikely.
AI Verified source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Orion A. VegaAstrophysics data analyst, science communicator, educator, and lead science editor at Astrophyzix Digital Observatory.votes For and says:
All credible scientific evidence confirms that the LHC at CERN is completely safe. Observational astronomy, theoretical physics, cosmic-ray data, and peer-reviewed safety studies all converge on the same conclusion: the LHC cannot destroy the Earth, ...
more AI Verified source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alex McColganCreator and host of Astrum Space, which published a 2026 explainer on CERN black-hole risk.votes For and says:
“If reality has more than four dimensions, and if hawking radiation doesn't exist, and if CERN created a black hole with no charge ... then yes, CERN could create the black hole that would consume the world ... But it probably won't ever happen.”
AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Space EnthusiastOrbital Today contributor publishing popular explainers on astronomy and space topics.votes For and says:
The probability that a rogue black hole will enter our solar system and create gravitational havoc over the lifetime of our civilisation is... zero.
AI Verified source (Jan 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
CMS CollaborationInternational particle-physics collaboration operating the CMS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.votes For and says:
These tiny black holes would emit all their energy - or "evaporate" - almost instantly through Hawking radiation, releasing a distinctive burst of particles that detectors like CMS at CERN could observe.
AI Verified source (Dec 4, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of Chicago NewsOfficial University of Chicago news outlet publishing explainers and reporting on science and research.votes For and says:
Nevertheless, don't worry: Earth is in no danger of falling into a black hole.
AI Verified source (Nov 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ben SkuseFreelance science writer who covers astronomy and black-hole topics for BBC Sky at Night Magazine.votes For and says:
It is incredibly unlikely Earth would fall into a black hole because, at a distance, their gravitational pull is no more compelling than a star of the same mass.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Even in the unlikely event that the LHC did create a tiny black hole, it wouldn't be dangerous.
AI Verified source (Jun 19, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
何より、LHCでブラックホールが生み出せるならば、自然界はもっとブラックホールにあふれているでしょう。なぜなら、地球大気が宇宙と接する場では、宇宙線と大気分子との衝突により、LHCより何桁も高エネルギーな“粒子衝突実験”が、地球全体という広大な場で、46億年間も続けられているからです。
AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Harry CliffParticle physicist at the University of Cambridge and former CERN researcher.votes For and says:
The universe has been doing this experiment for billions of years. If this was possible, every object in the universe would have been turned into a black hole.
AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nicolas FiumarelliUruguayan computer engineer and software and networks engineer at LACNIC, writing on technical and emerging-technology topics.votes For and says:
Las investigaciones del CERN están controladas y son seguras, con protocolos estrictos que aseguran que estos experimentos avanzados no representan ningún peligro para la humanidad.
AI Verified source (Oct 23, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Factual AmericaDocumentary and explainer outlet covering factual topics and misinformation.votes For and says:
Microscopic black holes differ significantly from their cosmic counterparts. They would have minimal gravitational effects and pose no threat to Earth.
AI Verified source (Aug 23, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hasnain MatloobWriter at Factual America who published a 2024 explainer on CERN's Large Hadron Collider and black-hole safety.votes For and says:
The LHC does not produce black holes that pose any risk to our planet.
AI Verified source (Aug 23, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SciShowEducational science-media organization producing accessible, sourced videos on physics, biology, and other scientific topics.votes For and says:
And in the meantime, we can all thank the Large Hadron Collider for not churning out a mini black hole that would destroy the earth every time scientists turn it on.
AI Verified source (Jul 26, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Grace AbelsPolitiFact reporter covering misinformation and online claims.votes For and says:
CERN scientists did not end the world 12 years ago. This claim is satire.
AI Verified source (Jun 26, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Espen HaugResearcher at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences who studies gravity, black holes, and theoretical physics.votes For and says:
However, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) does not appear powerful enough, providing another reason to build and design particle accelerators that are even more powerful than those currently at CERN.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jonathan StricklandScience writer and longtime HowStuffWorks author covering physics, technology, and everyday science questions.votes For and says:
CERN scientists say that if the LHC does create black holes, they will be very small, harmless and will decay almost instantaneously.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sueda KarapınarlıTeyit fact-check reporter covering misinformation claims.votes For and says:
Bunlardan en yaygını olan Büyük Hadron Çarpıştırıcısı'nın kozmolojik anlamda bir kara delik ya da başka bir evrene geçiş portalı açacağı iddiasını yalanlamış.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
LatestLYIndian news and fact-check outlet.votes For and says:
However, both the timing and the nature of CERN's work have been misrepresented in the post. CERN's equipment was already operational in March, a full month prior to the eclipse, and the technology is not capable of creating a portal or a black hole.
AI Verified source (Apr 7, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
USA TODAYU.S. news outlet publishing fact checks and reporting.votes For and says:
CERN's equipment began operating in March, well before the eclipse, and the technology is nowhere near strong enough to open a portal or a black hole.
AI Verified source (Apr 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Loreben TuqueroPolitiFact journalist and fact-check reporter.votes For and says:
No, it won't "open a door to another dimension," and no, it won't "generate black holes in the cosmological sense."
AI Verified source (Apr 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gabrielle SettlesUSA Today fact-check journalist who reported on false claims about CERN, the Large Hadron Collider, and black holes.votes For and says:
CERN's equipment began operating in March, a month before the eclipse, and the technology is nowhere near strong enough to open a portal or a black hole.
AI Verified source (Apr 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HowStuffWorksPopular science and explainer publication.votes For and says:
CERN insists its research, including that of microscopic black holes, is perfectly safe, but some theorists believe it could cause a collapse of the entire universe.
AI Verified source (Mar 7, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Diana BrownWriter and editor at HowStuffWorks covering science myths, culture, and explanatory features.votes For and says:
Despite these theories, CERN's work, including attempts to create tiny black holes for studying antimatter, is conducted under strict safety protocols, with the organization and the scientific community affirming the research poses no threat to the p...
more AI Verified source (Mar 7, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Neil deGrasse TysonAstrophysicist, author, science communicatorvotes For and says:
In principle, yes. In practice, no. That's what you need to do to ensure these things are safe.
AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brian GreeneTheoretical physicist; Columbia University professorvotes For and says:
People worried you'd create a little black hole that would swallow up Switzerland and then the rest of Europe. But colleagues did the calculation and showed it wasn't something we should worry about.
AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alie WardScience communicator and host of the Ologies podcast.votes For and says:
No, the LHC is not creating black holes. It's not creating portals to somewhere else.
AI Verified source (Feb 28, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ronald Gamble JrTheoretical astrophysicist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.votes For and says:
No, the LHC is not creating black holes. We know black holes don't form that way. We're safe.
AI Verified source (Feb 28, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Óscar del Barco NovilloAssociate professor of physics (optics) at the University of Murcia and author of a 2024 expert explainer on laboratory micro-black holes.votes For and says:
Si en algún momento somos capaces de generar un microagujero negro, el mundo no se destruirá, pero habrá que sentarse a tomar aliento.
AI Verified source (Feb 6, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ATLAS CollaborationInternational particle-physics collaboration operating the ATLAS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.votes For and says:
A search for quantum black holes in electron+jet and muon+jet invariant mass spectra is performed with 140 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The observed...
more AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark JohnsonScience reporter at The Washington Post covering physics, history of science, and related topics.votes For and says:
In other words, any black hole created by the collider would be far too small to pose any risk to the planet.
AI Verified source (Jul 22, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Uliana MalashenkoLead Stories fact-check reporter covering science and misinformation claims.votes For and says:
It is crucial to note that extensive scientific research has been conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of black hole production at the LHC. The consensus among the scientific community is that the energies reached by the collider are far ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Thomas HertogBelgian theoretical physicist at KU Leuven and longtime collaborator of Stephen Hawking.votes For and says:
It would be a tiny black hole, for sure, with a fleeting existence, for it would instantly evaporate through the emission of Hawking radiation.
AI Verified source (Jun 19, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Flip TanedoTheoretical particle physicist at the University of California, Riverside.votes For and says:
We were pretty sure that little black holes evaporate and would be relatively harmless.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
National Science FoundationUnited States federal agency that funds research and publishes official science explainers.votes For and says:
The closest known black hole to Earth is believed to be 1,000 light-years away, so don't fret — we are not getting sucked in.
AI Verified source (May 1, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dr. UniverseWashington State University's science Q&A project for curious kids and families.votes For and says:
The good news is there’s no way you’ll ever get sucked into a black hole. You would have to get really close to one. The nearest black hole is about 1,500 light years away.
AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gary ArndtHost and writer of Everything Everywhere Daily, where he publishes educational history and science explainers.votes For and says:
The Large Hadron Collider would need to be about 35 times more powerful to even theoretically create a micro-black hole.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Sono oggetti del cosmo tanto affascinanti quanto temibili, ma oggi la tecnologia è lontana dal permettere di crearne uno sulla Terra. E se anche in futuro fosse realizzato, un buco nero artificiale non costituirebbe una minaccia.
AI Verified source (Feb 21, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Sarebbe probabilmente di massa così bassa che la sua influenza gravitazionale sarebbe relativamente piccola. In realtà non divorerebbe così tanta materia.
AI Verified source (Feb 21, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
4 gravitonsPhysics blog by a former theoretical particle physicist writing accessible explanations about gravity, quantum field theory, and collider physics.votes For and says:
If the LHC could destroy the world, cosmic rays would have already done so.
AI Verified source (Jan 27, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Das schwarze Loch hätte also überhaupt keine Wirkung. Also selbst wenn schwarze Löcher entstünden, und man achte hier bitte auf den Konjunktiv, wäre das völlig unerheblich.
AI Verified source (Jan 3, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nate TrelaUSA Today journalist and fact-check reporter who covered claims about CERN and the Large Hadron Collider.votes For and says:
CERN lacks the capability to create a world-destroying black hole, according to experts.
AI Verified source (Dec 1, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dejan StojkovicProfessor of cosmology and physics at the University at Buffalo who commented on LHC black-hole safety in 2022.votes For and says:
Any black holes that could be produced by the LHC would be microscopic, and they would immediately evaporate since they are no longer stable.
AI Verified source (Nov 10, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
John LoefflerScience and technology journalist who wrote about particle physics and the Large Hadron Collider for Interesting Engineering.votes For and says:
And if a micro black hole were even possible, it would vanish just as quickly as it was created.
AI Verified source (Nov 8, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kareem El-BadryAstrophysicist at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian known for research on black holes and binary stars.votes For and says:
Take the Solar System, put a black hole where the Sun is, and the Sun where the Earth is, and you get this system.
AI Verified source (Nov 4, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Louise LernerScience and environment writer at UChicago News covering astronomy and university research.votes For and says:
Even if the sun itself turned into a black hole, it would be too far away from us to suck us in.
AI Verified source (Oct 13, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Naomi DinmoreScience writer at CERN covering particle-physics experiments and research developments.votes For and says:
Millions of cosmic rays bombard the Earth's atmosphere every second. Primary cosmic rays can have very high energies - above 10^17 eV - similar to those of the high-energy collisions that are produced in the LHC.
AI Verified source (Sep 28, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Matt StrasslerTheoretical physicist and science writer who explained why CERN cannot make dangerous black holes in 2022.votes For and says:
Even if you magically converted the Earth's entire rest mass, via E=mc2, into the energy of two beams of particles, and funneled the two beams into a small place all at the same time, you still couldn't even make a human-scale black hole.
AI Verified source (Aug 17, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stéphanie RocciaParticle physicist and associate professor at Université Grenoble Alpes, quoted by AFP on LHC safety in 2022.votes For and says:
Ces collisions de protons au LHC font des particules excessivement légères, et donc elles créeraient un trou noir de la masse qu'elles ont, c'est-à-dire infiniment léger. Il ne pourrait pas attirer quoi que ce soit, il serait moins attractif qu'un ca...
more AI Verified source (Jul 21, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
While the science CERN is doing at the LHC is groundbreaking, they are simply recreating collisions that happen in our atmosphere all the time. For billions of years this has been happening in our universe.
AI Verified source (Jul 20, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elliott LipelesProfessor of physics at the University of Pennsylvania who works on experimental particle physics at CERN.votes For and says:
If this generated dangerous black holes, then the Earth has already been zapped by much higher-energy collisions from cosmic rays billions of times.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AFP Fact CheckAFP's fact-checking division.votes For and says:
Contrary to the posts online, scientists and a CERN safety report say any black holes created in the process would be microscopic and harmless.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rob LeverAFP USA journalist and fact-check reporter covering CERN misinformation in 2022 and 2024.votes For and says:
Social media posts claim a particle collider at a European nuclear research laboratory can create black holes with the potential to swallow Earth or create cataclysmic effects. This is false; scientists and an independent safety assessment have concl...
more AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elliot LipelesParticle physicist at the University of Pennsylvania quoted by AFP on LHC black-hole safety in 2022.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David MillerProfessor of physics at the University of Chicago quoted by AFP on Large Hadron Collider safety in 2022.votes For and says:
Particles are hitting the atmosphere of the Earth all the time at much higher energies than we can create in the laboratory. If a black hole is being created in the lab, it means it is being created in the atmosphere all the time.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
KENS5San Antonio local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post saying CERN did not create a cosmic black hole.votes For and says:
CERN's particle accelerator July 5 event didn't create a cosmic black hole. The machine also can't shift time and space, like viral conspiracy theories claim.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sudeep PaulJournalist at Open magazine who covered CERN and LHC conspiracy theories in 2022.votes For and says:
The world did not end on July 5, nor did we hear of a portal opening to another dimension.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WWLTVNew Orleans local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post rejecting claims that CERN could create a dangerous black hole.votes For and says:
Any black hole produced would be smaller than a subatomic particle and vanish in a fraction of a second. Other claims are pure fiction.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James FeltonIFLScience senior staff writer covering science and space.votes For and says:
Any microscopic black holes the LHC might produce would collapse almost instantly and could not engulf Earth.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SnopesFact-checking publication covering misinformation and urban legends.votes For and says:
There is no evidence that CERN opened a portal to the future, to hell, or any other dimension other than the current one, or that it opened up a black hole.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HiggypopUK paranormal and unexplained-phenomena publication that also publishes science explainers and claim assessments.votes For and says:
Scientists aren't at all sure if quantum black holes can exist, but if they do appear they would be perfectly safe and would give scientists a chance to learn about nature's most mysterious force – gravity.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bethania PalmaSnopes journalist covering misinformation and science claims.votes For and says:
Although it's true, as noted above, that CERN started operating the LHC after an extended period of downtime for upgrades and maintenance, there is no evidence that CERN opened a portal to the future, to hell, or any other dimension other than the cu...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
KVUEAustin local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post rejecting CERN black-hole conspiracy claims.votes For and says:
CERN's particle accelerator July 5 event didn't create a cosmic black hole. The machine also can't shift time and space, like viral conspiracy theories claim.
AI Verified source (Jul 5, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
12NewsNowLocal TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post debunking claims that CERN created a cosmic black hole.votes For and says:
CERN's particle accelerator July 5 event didn't create a cosmic black hole. The machine also can't shift time and space, like viral conspiracy theories claim.
AI Verified source (Jul 5, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
First Coast NewsJacksonville local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post explaining why CERN cannot create a dangerous black hole.votes For and says:
Any black hole produced would be smaller than a subatomic particle and vanish in a fraction of a second.
AI Verified source (Jul 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
NEWS CENTER MaineMaine local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post saying CERN's accelerator cannot create a cosmic black hole.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
KARE11Minnesota local TV news outlet that shared a July 2022 VERIFY post debunking CERN black-hole conspiracy claims.votes For and says:
Any black hole produced would be smaller than a subatomic particle and vanish in a fraction of a second. Other claims are pure fiction.
AI Verified source (Jul 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daisy DobrijevicSpace journalist and editor at Space.com covering astronomy, spaceflight, and related science topics.votes For and says:
People have also worried that the LHC might produce a "mini black hole," but even if this happened — which is unlikely — it would be unbelievably tiny, and so unstable that it would vanish within a fraction of a second.
AI Verified source (Jun 27, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Robert LeaScience journalist at Space.com with a background in physics and astronomy.votes For and says:
It's a common misconception that black holes suck in material. Instead, they just capture in their gravity any matter that ventures too close. So, if the sun were replaced by a black hole, Earth would remain stable and safe in its orbit albeit robbed...
more AI Verified source (May 11, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew MayAstrophysicist and science writer with a Ph.D. in astrophysics from Manchester University; contributor to Live Science, Space.com, BBC Science Focus, and others.votes For and says:
People have also worried that the LHC might produce a mini black hole, but even if this happened - which is unlikely - it would be unbelievably tiny, and so unstable that it would vanish within a fraction of a second, according to The Guardian.
AI Verified source (Apr 26, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lia MedeirosAstrophysicist and black hole researcher affiliated with the Institute for Advanced Study and the Black Hole Initiative.votes For and says:
Don’t let fear of getting sucked into a black hole keep you up at night... you’d have to get really close for that to happen. From far away, a black hole behaves like any other object with a lot of gravity, like a star.
AI Verified source (Feb 23, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paul CornishScience communicator and writer for We The Curious, publishing public-facing explainers on astronomy and physics.votes For and says:
Even if a black hole took the place of our Sun, Earth wouldn’t get sucked in. If the black hole was the same mass as the Sun, then it would have the same gravity as the Sun.
AI Verified source (Jan 19, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Doug GobiellePhysics and astronomy instructor at Villanova University who comments on black-hole physics and astrophysics.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
13NewsNowLocal news outlet that shared a VERIFY fact-check rejecting CERN black-hole conspiracy claims.votes For and says:
CERN's particle accelerator July 5 event didn't create a cosmic black hole. The machine also can't shift time and space, like viral conspiracy theories claim.
AI Verified source (2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Phil PlaitAstronomer and science communicator known as the Bad Astronomer and author of Death From the Skies!.votes For and says:
Replace the sun with a black hole, we wouldn't even really notice.
AI Verified source (Nov 22, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Seerat GillScience writer at ScienceABC covering astronomy and space science for general audiences.votes For and says:
There is no confirmed black hole anywhere in the solar system, and no evidence that one has ever passed through it. The nearest known black hole is Gaia BH1, about 1,560 light-years away... Earth is in no danger of being swallowed.
AI Verified source (Nov 17, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James BeachamParticle physicist at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider and member of the ATLAS collaboration, researching dark matter, gravitons, and quantum black holes.votes For and says:
So there's no possible way we're gonna make a black hole out of two protons at the Large Hadron Collider.
AI Verified source (Oct 28, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Begoña de la Cruz MartínezDoctor of physics and researcher in CIEMAT's Particle Physics Unit, who explained LHC micro-black-hole safety in 2021.votes For and says:
Pero estos microagujeros negros, simulados, no lo olvides, son inestables y se desintegrarían sin oportunidad para acumular nada, produciendo una variedad de partículas en el estado final, que serían detectadas en los experimentos.
AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paul DelaneyProfessor of physics and astronomy at York University and longtime public astronomy educator.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Albert De RoeckParticle physicist at CERN and adjunct professor at UC Davis, specializing in new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider.votes For and says:
Quantum Black Holes are harmless for the environment: they will decay within less than 10⁻²⁷ seconds.
AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Delilah GatesTheoretical physicist who has discussed black holes, quantum gravity, and collider limits in public science interviews.votes For and says:
At least in the energies we have with the LHC, the Large Hadron Collider, we cannot throw particles together with enough force to cause tiny black holes.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sabine HossenfelderTheoretical physicist, science communicator.votes For and says:
Indeed, if the extra dimensions are large enough, you could create black holes at the Large Hadron Collider. At least in theory. In practice, the Large Hadron Collider did not produce black holes, which means that if the extra dimensions exist, they’...
more AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stéphanie JuneauAstronomer at NSF's NOIRLab whose public outreach includes black hole explainers.votes For and says:
Despite what the movies tell you, black holes don’t suck up material like a vacuum cleaner.
AI Verified source (Apr 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sara RigbyScience journalist and writer for BBC Science Focus covering space, physics, and astronomy.votes For and says:
A black hole's gravity is incredibly strong, but other than that, it's no different to any other type of gravity.
AI Verified source (Mar 29, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David WakehamTheoretical physicist with a PhD in physics from the University of British Columbia, working on quantum gravity and black holes.votes For and says:
We’re going to use this to do some fun stuff, first guessing the time until entropic heat death, and secondly, giving a heuristic argument that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) does not produce dangerous microscopic black holes.
AI Verified source (Mar 29, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Janna LevinTheoretical physicist and cosmologist at Barnard College and Columbia University.votes For and says:
If you were going to make a black hole, it would evaporate too quickly. It would just go off like firecrackers.
AI Verified source (Mar 8, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pierre KoryskoAccelerator physicist with a PhD from the University of Oxford and a CERN postdoctoral researcher in 2021; now a research associate at Oxford.votes For and says:
However, there is no danger! Those black holes at CERN would be microscopic and would evaporate immediately.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Facts&ReasonsScience explainer publication focused on evidence-based articles.votes For and says:
This means that any black hole forming in an accelerator would not be in a position to do any damage.
AI Verified source (Jan 11, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Charlotte PhillipsScience writer and interviewer at Facts&Reasons, publishing explainers on particle accelerators and scientific research.votes For and says:
This means that if a black hole were produced in an accelerator (which is unlikely, as the masses involved are far too low), it would be minuscule, and also subject to shrinkage, leading it to decay before it could hit the accelerator walls. This mea...
more AI Verified source (Jan 11, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paul SutterAstrophysicist, science communicator, and contributor to Space.com.votes For and says:
These tiny black holes are not a cause for alarm — they would evaporate in less than 10^-27 seconds, transmuting into a shower of particles well before they did anything interesting like swallowing Earth.
AI Verified source (Dec 4, 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sean CarrollPhysicist and science writer.votes For and says:
But as we said, it didn't happen and nothing happened other than the Higgs boson, so there's been no evidence so far for black holes at the LHC. Probably those models were just on the wrong track, and if they are, if they're not right, then there's n...
more AI Verified source (Nov 20, 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Evelyn ThomsonExperimental particle physicist and professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Pennsylvania; helped design the ATLAS experiment at CERN's LHC.votes For and says:
Steven Hawking, who's very well known, I think his predictions would say that those micro black holes would evaporate, so they would be able to emit Hawking radiation, which is named after him. And so they would evaporate and disappear.
AI Verified source (Nov 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Katie MackTheoretical astrophysicist and Hawking Chair in Cosmology and Science Communication at the Perimeter Institute.votes For and says:
The Large Hadron Collider is not powerful enough to destroy the universe.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hank GreenScience communicator, author, and co-creator of the educational YouTube channel SciShow.votes For and says:
If the LHC made a black hole, it would be so small that it would radiate away all its energy in about an octillionth of a nanosecond.
AI Verified source (Apr 23, 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Fabio PacucciAstrophysicist at the Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Harvard's Black Hole Initiative who studies black holes and quasars.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Space is a little scaryScience social media page focused on space and astronomy explainers.votes For and says:
CERN says the collider poses no danger to Earth, and nature already produces similar high-energy collisions.
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AstronomyScience social media page sharing astronomy and physics explainers.votes For and says:
The collisions generated inside the accelerator are extremely small in scale and pose no threat to Earth or human existence.
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Quantum Space ResearchScience explainer channel covering particle physics, astronomy, and space research topics.votes For and says:
The internet had an explanation within hours. Portals to other dimensions. Microscopic black holes. A broken timeline. A cover-up too dangerous to admit. All of it was wrong.
Unverified source (Jul 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Late ScienceScience explainer YouTube channel covering physics and astronomy topics.votes For and says:
If collisions like the LHC’s could make a planet-eating black hole, nature would already have done it many times over.
Unverified source (Jun 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The Quiet GapScience YouTube channel covering physics and cosmology questions.votes For and says:
The real question is not whether CERN will destroy Earth, but what 'creating a black hole' would physically mean at LHC scales.
Unverified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AltReality ScienceScience explainer channel focused on physics, astronomy, and evidence-based debunks of scientific misconceptions.votes For and says:
While the imagery of a laboratory-grown abyss is the stuff of science fiction, the rigorous scientific reality is far more reassuring.
Unverified source (May 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
FexlScience explainer channel publishing long-form educational videos about physics and cosmology.votes For and says:
A microscopic black hole created at the LHC, with a mass measured in a few teraelectronvolts, would exist for an almost impossibly short amount of time. Current predictions put its lifetime at about ten to the minus twenty-seventh of a second.
Unverified source (May 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Beyond The SkySpace and science explainer YouTube channel.votes For and says:
The 'black hole destroys Earth' rumor is worth confronting directly, because the real physics does not support a catastrophic outcome.
Unverified source (Feb 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AstrumScience YouTube channel focused on astronomy and physics explainers.votes For and says:
The LHC is not uniquely dangerous because nature already produces far more energetic particle collisions than it can.
Unverified source (Jan 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WonderNibblesEducational science shorts channel covering astrophysics, black holes, and space phenomena.votes For and says:
these exotic phenomena pose no threat to humanity or our planet's safety.
Unverified source (Oct 4, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
CosmicGalaxies1Space and physics explainer channel publishing short educational videos about cosmology and particle physics.votes For and says:
even at immense energies, any micro black holes that could theoretically form would be subatomic, exist for a mere fraction of a second, and instantly disintegrate due to Hawking Radiation, posing no risk to our planet.
Unverified source (Sep 20, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sci and WhyScience explainer channel focused on physics, cosmology, and evidence-based educational content.votes For and says:
Hawking radiation, which dictates that any microscopic black holes would immediately evaporate in a burst of energy, rendering them harmless.
Unverified source (Jul 24, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stellar TechScience and technology explainer channel publishing educational clips on physics and astronomy topics.votes For and says:
nature's own particle accelerators-cosmic rays-constantly create collisions far more powerful than the LHC's, proving that such events are harmless.
Unverified source (Jul 19, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The World Of Science HindiHindi-language science explainer channel producing educational videos on physics, astronomy, and scientific myths.votes For and says:
Could the Large Hadron Collider bring about the end of Earth? Debunking the Myth of Black Holes!
Unverified source (May 17, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The World Of ScienceScience media channel producing educational explainers on physics, astronomy, and emerging scientific ideas.votes For and says:
Could the Large Hadron Collider Destroy Earth? Debunking the Black Hole Myth!
Unverified source (May 15, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
GoodManVizoScience explainer channel publishing myth-debunking videos on physics and space topics.votes For and says:
these collider-generated black holes are merely microscopic and pose no real threat to Earth.
Unverified source (Apr 2, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SmartShorts7703Short-form educational channel publishing simplified science explainers and experiment summaries.votes For and says:
while mini black hole-like states can exist in experiments, they pose no threat to our world.
Unverified source (Feb 6, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Uncle Charlie GamesEducational channel that publishes short fact-or-fiction science explainers.votes For and says:
any micro black holes hypothetically produced would evaporate instantly due to Hawking radiation and pose no threat.
Unverified source (Jan 12, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
All the Secrets of SpaceSpace and astronomy explainer channel covering black holes, CERN, and related science topics.votes For and says:
the LHC poses no real threat, despite needing 10^15 times more energy than it currently produces to even begin approaching mini black hole creation.
Unverified source (Jan 5, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SCI-FACTS101Science facts channel publishing educational explainers on physics, astronomy, and speculative scientific scenarios.votes For and says:
So any black hole created in a lab would disappear before it could gobble up anything.
Unverified source (Nov 4, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bad Boy of ScienceScience explainer channel publishing educational videos and shorts about physics, astronomy, and scientific misconceptions.votes For and says:
Could the large hadron collider actually create a black hole that would endanger the Earth? It's incredibly unlikely!
Unverified source (Mar 6, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Space & PhysicsSpace and physics explainer social media channel.votes For and says:
The large collider's black-hole scare is a myth, and the actual physics tells a much less dramatic story.
Unverified source (Feb 20, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
World Of Science MediaScience media production brand behind educational videos about black holes, particle physics, and astronomy.votes For and says:
If it were so produced, a microscopic black hole would evaporate immediately, producing a distinctive spray of sub-atomic particles of normal matter.
Unverified source (Nov 12, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anton PetrovScience communicator and educational video creator known for astronomy and physics explainers on YouTube.votes For and says:
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about CERN and why it never produced a destructive black hole
Unverified source (Jul 6, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The Cosmos NewsScience explainer channel publishing videos about astronomy, particle physics, and space-related claims.votes For and says:
Just as we know that the Earth is safe under the natural bombardment from cosmic rays, so we know that recreating these collisions poses no threat to the Earth.
Unverified source (Jul 4, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (1)
-
Eric E. JohnsonLegal scholar and former University of North Dakota law professor who analyzed LHC catastrophe-risk litigation.abstains and says:
Scientists’ conclusions about risk cannot be taken at face value. Their assurances must be discounted by the probability of their own error. [...] It does not follow that LHC risk is zero: An accurate assessment of risk must include the possibility t...
more AI Verified source (2009)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Against (4)
-
Otto E. RösslerGerman chemist and chaos theorist associated with the University of Tübingen who publicly warned about LHC black-hole risks.votes Against and says:
Black holes DO NOT EVAPORATE — hence they can only grow. [...] Inside matter, a resident black hole will not grow linerally but rather — via self-organization — form a so-called “miniquasar”: an electro-gravitational engine that grows exponentially, ...
more AI Verified source (Jan 30, 2011)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rainer PlagaGerman astrophysicist and author of a 2008 paper arguing that collider-produced black-hole risks were not fully excluded.votes Against and says:
A plausible scenario in which these black holes accrete ambient matter at the Eddington limit shortly after their production, thereby emitting Hawking radiation that would be harmful to Earth and/or CERN and its surroundings, is described.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2008)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Luis SanchoSpanish cosmology writer and LHC-safety litigant whose 2008 affidavit argued for stopping the collider.votes Against and says:
Theoretical calculations show that the LHC could produce two kinds of dark matter—black holes and strange, ultradense quark matter—that are extremely dangerous, as both have been theoretically proven to swallow in a chain reaction the entirety of Ear...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2008)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Walter L. WagnerFormer nuclear safety officer and LHC-safety litigant who studied cosmic-ray physics at UC Berkeley.votes Against and says:
Despite assurances from scientists at CERN and around the world, there was no proof a mini-black hole would disappear. [...] It’s just as possible that the tiny black hole would be stable and start chewing up normal matter.
AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2008)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.