The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) poses no credible risk of destroying Earth by creating a microscopic black hole

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends
Cast your vote:
Results (183 votes):
Total (183 votes)
For 178 (97%) Abstain 1 (1%) Against 4 (2%)
·
Quotes (182) Users (0)
  • Eric E. Johnson
    Legal scholar and former University of North Dakota law professor who analyzed LHC catastrophe-risk litigation.
    abstains and says:
    Scientists’ conclusions about risk cannot be taken at face value. Their assurances must be discounted by the probability of their own error. [...] It does not follow that LHC risk is zero: An accurate assessment of risk must include the possibility t...
    more AI Verified source (2009)
    Like Comment Share on X added 19d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Otto E. Rössler
    German chemist and chaos theorist associated with the University of Tübingen who publicly warned about LHC black-hole risks.
    votes Against and says:
    Black holes DO NOT EVAPORATE — hence they can only grow. [...] Inside matter, a resident black hole will not grow linerally but rather — via self-organization — form a so-called “miniquasar”: an electro-gravitational engine that grows exponentially, ...
    more AI Verified source (Jan 30, 2011)
    Like Comment Share on X added 19d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Rainer Plaga
    German astrophysicist and author of a 2008 paper arguing that collider-produced black-hole risks were not fully excluded.
    votes Against and says:
    A plausible scenario in which these black holes accrete ambient matter at the Eddington limit shortly after their production, thereby emitting Hawking radiation that would be harmful to Earth and/or CERN and its surroundings, is described.
    AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2008)
    Like Comment Share on X added 19d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Luis Sancho
    Spanish cosmology writer and LHC-safety litigant whose 2008 affidavit argued for stopping the collider.
    votes Against and says:
    Theoretical calculations show that the LHC could produce two kinds of dark matter—black holes and strange, ultradense quark matter—that are extremely dangerous, as both have been theoretically proven to swallow in a chain reaction the entirety of Ear...
    more AI Verified source (Jun 2008)
    Like Comment Share on X added 19d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Walter L. Wagner
    Former nuclear safety officer and LHC-safety litigant who studied cosmic-ray physics at UC Berkeley.
    votes Against and says:
    Despite assurances from scientists at CERN and around the world, there was no proof a mini-black hole would disappear. [...] It’s just as possible that the tiny black hole would be stable and start chewing up normal matter.
    AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2008)
    Like Comment Share on X added 19d ago
    Info
    Delegate