We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expert opinions on Research Policy
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances on Research Policy from AI researchers, executives and policymakers.
1813 sourced quotes · 22 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
46 opinions
For (46)Added 18h agoUniversity of OxfordUniversity and research institution publishing official information on government-backed AI research and safety.votes For and says:The University of Oxford has been selected to host a new, cross-university government-backed UK AI Research Lab. The new lab is part of a ÂŁ60 million investment announced today by the UKRI's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Democratic middle powers should jointly develop frontier AI and share its benefits globally
25 opinions
For (23)Added 19h agoWillemijn AerdtsDutch State Secretary for Digital Economy and Sovereignty.votes For and says:Door samen met Europese partners te investeren in AI versterken we onze economie én onze digitale soevereiniteit.
AI Verified source (Jul 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Added 2mo agoBroderick McDonaldResearch Fellow at King's College London (XCEPT) and Oxford Emerging Threats Group; Visiting Fellow at the Alan Turing Institute; AI security researchervotes Against and says:Middle powers like the UK and Canada will not win the race for ever larger AI models, but through collaboration they can win the deployment race.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (124)Added 21h agoLeon StauferUniversity of Cambridge researcher and lead author of the AI Agent Index update on AI-agent safety transparency.votes For and says:
Developers publish broad, top-level safety and ethics frameworks that sound reassuring, but are publishing limited empirical evidence needed to actually understand the risks.
AI Verified source (Feb 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)Added 22h agoComputer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)Technology trade associationvotes Against and says:The draft implementing regulation should clearly differentiate between API access, which should be the preferred method for safety evaluations where access to documents and relevant information are deemed insufficient, and “further” means of access, ...
more AI Verified source (Apr 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (53)Added 22h agoMary InmanWhistleblower attorney with 30+ years experience; founding board member of Psst nonprofit providing secure digital safe and legal support for AI whistleblowersvotes For and says:
The confidentiality agreements often contain gagging language that violates an SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] law that says you can’t interfere with a whistleblower’s ability to report to external regulators.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Added 1mo agoChristopher DavisVice President of Public Policy at the Connecticut Business & Industry Association (CBIA)votes Against and says:Connecticut already has strong whistleblower laws that protect employees from retaliation. [...] creating a separate, AI-specific whistleblower regime could lead to confusion, duplication, and unintended consequences for employers operating in highly...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (61)Added 1d agoGovernment of BangladeshNational government of Bangladesh, speaking through its delegation at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
To give full effect to the right to erasure under applicable data protection law, the government shall interpret such right as extending to AI systems trained on personal data. Where an AI system has been trained using data that was unlawfully obtain...
more AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 3d agoInformation Technology and Innovation FoundationUS innovation policy think tankvotes Against and says:Restricting access to training data, whether through mandatory compensation, expanded opt-out rights, or onerous compliance requirements, can have the effect of restricting AI development itself.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
108 opinions
For (97)Added 5d agoCouncil of EuropeInternational organization promoting human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in Europe.votes For and says:The vote marks an important step in the EU’s internal procedure for concluding the Framework Convention and reflects institutional support for the first international legally binding treaty addressing artificial intelligence in the context of human r...
more AI Verified source (Mar 12, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Added 4d agoLord MarkhamConservative member of the UK House of Lords; supports strong AI safety monitoring, alignment checks, and kill-switch research.votes Against and says:For me, a one-sided moratorium which ties our hands behind our backs while the likes of North Korea and the al-Qaedas of the world crack on: no, I am afraid that that worries me even more.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Build artificial general intelligence
51 opinions
For (30)Added 1d agoGoogleSearch and advertising companyvotes For and says:Such technological advancement will provide society with invaluable tools to address critical global challenges, including drug discovery, economic growth and climate change.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 9mo agoMustafa SuleymanMicrosoft AI CEO; authorabstains and says:This is going to be the most productive decade in the history of our species. But in order to truly reap the benefits of AI, we need to learn how to contain it. Paradoxically, part of that will mean collectively saying no to certain forms of progress...
more Disputed source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (20)Added 3d agoYann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:There’s no such thing as AGI. There is human-level AI, but human intelligence is extremely specialised. So calling it general intelligence is complete nonsense.
AI Verified source (Feb 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (25)Added 3d agoThinking MachinesAI model developer whose Inkling model card reports pre-release safety evaluations and benchmarks.votes For and says:
Inkling reports reasoning, agentic, factuality, chat, vision, audio, and safety benchmark results at effort=0.99.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Added 4mo agoAndrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (61)Added 4d agoAirlangga HartartoIndonesia’s Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs, speaking on AI cooperation and international AI governance.votes For and says:
AI should become a bridge for cooperation, not a tool for division. WAICO will also help ensure AI is managed in a safe, trustworthy, and ethical manner.
AI Verified source (Jul 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 6mo agoMiles BrundageAI policy researcher; founder of AVERI (AI Verification Initiative); former OpenAI Head of Policy Researchabstains and says:But the main regret I have with this talk is that I wish I had prepared a more for the section on a “CERN for AI.” The idea behind such a project is to pool many countries’ and companies’ resources into a single (possibly physically decentralized) ci...
more AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2024) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 6mo agoDaniela DiaconuELLIS scientific coordinator.votes Against and says:Currently, so many needs for innovation are put under the label of AI that there will be no way to address them with a single organisation.
AI Verified source (2020) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (143)Added 7d agoSimon ClarkeAssociate professor in cellular microbiology at the University of Reading.votes For and says:
It always seemed entirely plausible to me that Covid escaped from a laboratory, but that doesn’t mean that it was deliberate or the result of nefarious activity.
AI Verified source (Mar 2, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (108)Added 5d agoJing-Bao NieProfessor of bioethics at the University of Otago, writing on COVID-19 origins and global biosecurity.abstains and says:This acknowledgement should not lead to the dismissal of the possibility (e.g., accidental leakage from a BSL-4 or lower biosafety level laboratory) or the legitimate concerns surrounding biosecurity and biosafety in general.
AI Verified source (Jan 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (178)Added 7d agoDong-Yan JinVirology professor at the University of Hong Kong who studies molecular virology and antiviral immunity.votes Against and says:The story of lab leak in Wuhan is a fiction and it is as ridiculous as the counterclaim that Sars-CoV-2 comes from lab leaks in the US.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (136)Added 5d agoPeter MillerCOVID-19 origins researcher and Rootclaim debate participantvotes For and says:
The problem is that argument doesn’t work — all evidence points to Covid starting around the same time the market outbreak started.
AI Verified source (Apr 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (31)Added 8d agoJulian TangClinical virologist and honorary associate professor at the University of Leicester.abstains and says:All he is saying in this Science article is that we need better, more comprehensive patient case and dated viral sequence data – at the time of first appearance of these viruses – to make this viral phylogenetic/evolutionary history approach more acc...
more AI Verified source (Nov 19, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (111)Added 8d agoQian ZhaohuiResearcher at the Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, working on COVID-19 origins research.votes Against and says:The data from the paper support the notion that Huanan market may have been just an amplifier of COVID-19 transmission, rather than the place where COVID-19 originated.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (96)Added 8d agoCoalition for Metabolic HealthAdvocacy organization focused on metabolic-health research and nutrition policy.votes For and says:
Much of the evidence used to shape the recommendations comes from epidemiological studies—large population surveys that look for associations between diet and disease. While these studies can generate hypotheses, they cannot prove cause and effect. T...
more AI Verified source (Sep 29, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 9d agoHoward E. LeWinePhysician and Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing.votes Against and says:The evidence that cholesterol in one egg a day is safe for most people comes from huge studies — many conducted here at Harvard Medical School — that have followed hundreds of thousands of people over decades.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (67)Added 8d agoCenter for Statistics and the Social SciencesUniversity of Washington interdisciplinary research center for statistical methods in social-science research.votes For and says:
Bayesian reasoning serves as a bridge between quantitative and qualitative research that allows one to analyze any and all kinds of data within a single, unified inferential framework. This paper demonstrates the strength and flexibility of the Bayes...
more AI Verified source (Nov 9, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (6)Added 14d agogecStatModeling commenter on uncertainty and COVID-19 originsabstains and says:The arguments around covid origins seem largely to fall into an inference trap Andrew has termed premature collapse of the wavefunction. Rather than maintaining multiple hypotheses with different levels of credibility, there seems to be a desire to c...
more AI Verified source (Aug 1, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (68)Added 8d agoGregory D. KoblentzGeorge Mason biodefense program directorvotes Against and says:Determining the origin of an outbreak or pandemic can be divided into four stages: detection, identification, characterization, and attribution. Understanding how a specific pathogen entered and spread in a population to cause an outbreak is a multid...
more AI Verified source (Apr 10, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) poses no credible risk of destroying Earth by creating a microscopic black hole
182 opinions
For (177)Added 10d agoEdd GentBritish freelance science writer covering technology, engineering, bioscience, and science policy for Live Science and other outlets.votes For and says:Creating even a microscopic black hole or wormhole would require an accelerator the size of the whole universe, say researchers.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 10d agoEric E. JohnsonLegal scholar and former University of North Dakota law professor who analyzed LHC catastrophe-risk litigation.abstains and says:Scientists’ conclusions about risk cannot be taken at face value. Their assurances must be discounted by the probability of their own error. [...] It does not follow that LHC risk is zero: An accurate assessment of risk must include the possibility t...
more AI Verified source (2009)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 10d agoLuis SanchoSpanish cosmology writer and LHC-safety litigant whose 2008 affidavit argued for stopping the collider.votes Against and says:Theoretical calculations show that the LHC could produce two kinds of dark matter—black holes and strange, ultradense quark matter—that are extremely dangerous, as both have been theoretically proven to swallow in a chain reaction the entirety of Ear...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2008)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (13)Added 6mo agoCentre for Future GenerationsEuropean think tank on emerging technologiesvotes For and says:
Create a single, dedicated talent hub, accompanied by 1-5 separate compute hubs;
AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)Added 16d agoA Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI DevelopmentNovember 2025 Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative memo (29 co-authors incl. Yoshua Bengio) arguing that "AI bridge powers" should jointly develop frontier AIvotes Against and says:A semi-distributed structure, with a few core facilities, leveraging members' comparative advantages. Core facilities—fewer in number than the participating states—are necessary to create a critical mass of talent. Similarly, distributed compute can ...
more AI Verified source (Nov 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.