We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Fei-Fei Li
Stanford AI professor; HAI co-director
It’s very dangerous to make this a dichotomy between complete openness all the way to complete closedness. In complex software systems as well as scientific systems it’s much more nuanced.AI Verified (Aug 12, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Relevant: the quote directly addresses the openness-vs.-closedness tradeoff in frontier AI, and the source context says Li argues openness should vary by layer rather than be all-or-nothing, which makes her nuanced stance on a mixed public-R&D / closed-weights policy determinable. ([tech.yahoo.com](https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/ai-safety-concerns-mount-three-175100465.html?utm_source=openai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 16d ago
AI Unverifiable
Li advocates context-dependent degrees of openness but does not determine a stance on this specific public-R&D/closed-weights requirement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 16d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
For: Li said it’s dangerous to frame AI as a choice between “complete openness” and “complete closedness,” and the article context describes her as favoring a more nuanced public-private model, citing the Human Genome Project. That makes a hybrid policy with public R&D and closed weights the closest fit, though she did not endorse this exact wording. ([tech.yahoo.com](https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/ai-safety-concerns-mount-three-175100465.html?utm_source=openai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 16d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The TechCrunch report of the Ai4 conference reproduces Fei-Fei Li's wording verbatim.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 16d ago
replying to Fei-Fei Li