Comment by Fei-Fei Li

Stanford AI professor; HAI co-director
It’s very dangerous to make this a dichotomy between complete openness all the way to complete closedness. In complex software systems as well as scientific systems it’s much more nuanced.
AI Verified (Aug 12, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: the quote directly addresses the openness-vs.-closedness tradeoff in frontier AI, and the source context says Li argues openness should vary by layer rather than be all-or-nothing, which makes her nuanced stance on a mixed public-R&D / closed-weights policy determinable. ([tech.yahoo.com](https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/ai-safety-concerns-mount-three-175100465.html?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 · 16d ago
AI Unverifiable Li advocates context-dependent degrees of openness but does not determine a stance on this specific public-R&D/closed-weights requirement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 16d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified For: Li said it’s dangerous to frame AI as a choice between “complete openness” and “complete closedness,” and the article context describes her as favoring a more nuanced public-private model, citing the Human Genome Project. That makes a hybrid policy with public R&D and closed weights the closest fit, though she did not endorse this exact wording. ([tech.yahoo.com](https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/ai-safety-concerns-mount-three-175100465.html?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 · 16d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The TechCrunch report of the Ai4 conference reproduces Fei-Fei Li's wording verbatim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 16d ago
replying to Fei-Fei Li