Sam Altman

People need to have agency, the ability to influence this. They need, we need to sort of jointly be architects of the future. (source)

First, it is vital that AI companies–especially those working on the most powerful models–adhere to an appropriate set of safety requirements, including internal and external testing prior to release and publication of evaluation results. (source)

I strongly believe that we must regulate AI to prevent potential risks and ensure its ethical use. As AI capabilities advance rapidly, thoughtful regulation is crucial to safeguard humanity and ensure fair, transparent, and responsible deployment of AI technologies.

I strongly believe that AI agents should be allowed to open and manage bank accounts. As we advance in AI technology, these systems can offer unparalleled efficiency and accuracy in financial management. AI agents can analyze vast amounts of data far more effectively than humans, leading to improved decision-making and customized financial solutions. Furthermore, implementing proper regulatory frameworks and security measures will ensure the safe integration of AI into financial services, benefiting both individuals and businesses.

As a leader in AI development, I believe it's crucial for the first lab that achieves artificial superintelligence to prevent others from creating competing ASIs. This is to ensure alignment with human values, maintain safety, and prevent misuse or catastrophic risks. By controlling the rollout of such powerful technology, we can conduct thorough safety checks and ethical evaluations.

As the CEO of OpenAI, I strongly believe that frontier AI labs have a responsibility to contribute to a global AI safety fund. AI has the potential to transform societies, but it also brings risks that we must mitigate collectively. By supporting a global AI safety fund, we can ensure that resources are allocated to researching and implementing best practices for AI safety, ultimately protecting humanity from unintended consequences.

As someone deeply invested in the future of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that permitting the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities holds tremendous potential. These advancements could revolutionize industries, enhance human capabilities, and address complex global challenges. The key is to develop these technologies responsibly, with stringent ethical guidelines and comprehensive safety measures in place.

I firmly believe it is essential to consider legacy humans when forming AI policies. As AI continues to evolve, we must ensure that its development and deployment benefit all of humanity, not just a select few. This involves understanding and addressing the diverse needs and rights of people who engage with AI systems. By including the perspectives of all individuals, we can create policies that are fair and inclusive, preventing any unintended consequences that might arise from advancements in AI.

I believe a CERN for AI could play a vital role in establishing geopolitical parity in AI capabilities. By fostering collaboration and sharing resources among nations, we can ensure that AI's benefits are distributed more equitably and reduce the risk of conflict over technological dominance.

As we rapidly advance in AI development, I believe it is crucial to establish international regulations to ensure these technologies are used safely and ethically. Pausing AI advancement allows us to create global standards that can protect society from potential risks and ensure alignment with human values.

As someone deeply involved in the development of artificial intelligence, I understand the immense potential benefits and risks associated with this technology. The threat of AI being misused by terrorist organizations is very real and concerning. While privacy is an important issue, some level of invasive surveillance might be necessary to prevent catastrophic incidents and ensure public safety. It is crucial, however, that any surveillance measures are balanced with strong oversight and transparency to protect individual freedoms.

I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive and free market environment. Instead, we should focus on creating robust regulations and ethical guidelines to ensure AI development aligns with public interests without stifling innovation.

I believe exempting small companies from most AI regulations could indeed fuel innovation. It lowers the barrier to entry, allowing nimble startups to experiment and iterate quickly without being bogged down by heavy compliance. However, we must ensure that there are safeguards in place to prevent misuse and manage risks effectively.

I believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement can drive incredible innovation and advancements in AI. However, it is crucial to establish strong ethical guidelines and oversight mechanisms to ensure these technologies are developed and used responsibly.

I believe that liability for AI-caused harm should indeed be shared between the developer and the deployer. As someone deeply involved in AI development, I understand the complexities involved in creating robust AI systems. While developers must ensure that AI systems are designed ethically and with safety in mind, deployers play a critical role in the real-world application of these technologies. Both parties have responsibilities, and a shared approach to liability encourages collaboration in minimizing potential harms.

AI safety is critical, but pausing training isn't always feasible. We must balance innovation with safety, ensuring protocols evolve continuously.

As someone deeply involved in AI development, I recognize the immense potential and risks that come with super-persuasive AI. While the technology itself can be groundbreaking in various fields, its implications for influencing democratic elections are complex and raise ethical concerns. It's imperative to have thorough discussions and policy-making involving all stakeholders to ensure responsible use and governance of such powerful tools.

I agree that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial. The impact of AI on society is profound, and having a diverse and global perspective on its ethical guidelines ensures responsible development and deployment. Collaborative oversight can help mitigate risks and promote beneficial outcomes for humanity.

Transparency is key in the age of AI. If a video on YouTube is generated by artificial intelligence, it should be clearly labeled. This helps users make informed decisions about the content they're viewing.

While AI safety is crucial, dedicating a third of compute resources to it might not be the best approach. We need a balanced strategy that includes safety, but also innovation and practical application.

I believe that as AI systems become more capable, it is crucial for their decision-making processes to be interpretable. This transparency is necessary to ensure safety, accountability, and trust in AI technologies. Understanding AI decisions can help us identify and mitigate biases, prevent misuse, and align these systems with human values.

I believe frontier-model developers should publish their model cards before commercial release. Transparency is crucial in AI development to ensure understanding of the models' capabilities and limitations, which can help mitigate potential risks and foster trust with users and the broader public.

I believe it's essential to approach AI regulation thoughtfully to balance innovation and safety. While I have some concerns about the implementation details of the EU AI Act, I think it's crucial for policymakers, technologists, and the public to engage in ongoing discussions rather than rush to repeal it right now.