We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
future (4)
×
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
agi (2)
ai (2)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-policy (2)
existential-risk (2)
policy (2)
economics (1)
ethics (1)
future-of-work (1)
impact-on-labor (1)
inequality (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We may have to pace the rate of AI development to give ourselves enough time for society to harden around some of these new capability levels.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
-
Sam Altman
votes Against
and says:
But the governance of the most powerful systems, as well as decisions regarding their deployment, must have strong public oversight. We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. Second, w...
more AI Verified source (2023) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
Development of superhuman machine intelligence (SMI) [1] is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity. There are other threats that I think are more certain to happen (for example, an engineered virus with a long incubation ...
more AI Verified source (2015)