YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Adede

Human avatar
Statistical Modeling blog commenter on Bayesian analysis and COVID-19 origins
If the bayesian stuff makes no sense, that doesn’t bode well for the rest of the paper.
AI Verified (Feb 1, 2021)
Source:
Adede, comment on Andrew Gelman, "About that claim that ‘SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived’", Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science, February 1, 2021.
Like Share on X 20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
Bayesian analysis is the right framework for settling the COVID-19 origins question
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly criticizes the Bayesian part of a COVID-origins paper, so it is directly relevant to whether Bayesian analysis is the right framework. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Saying the Bayesian part makes no sense opposes the statement that Bayesian analysis is the right framework for settling the question. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 18d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The source URL contains the exact text in the comment thread, attributed to “Adede” and timestamped February 1, 2021 (9:41 AM): the quote matches verbatim, and the stored author, date, and source URL are consistent with the page. ([statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu](https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/02/01/about-that-claim-that-sars-cov-2-is-not-a-natural-zoonosis-but-instead-is-laboratory-derived/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago
replying to Adede