Gkikas Magiorkinis on COVID-19 originated from a lab-related …

Gkikas Magiorkinis

Assistant professor of hygiene and epidemiology at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Thus, to sum-up, closely related coronaviruses have been retrieved from animals such as bats and pangolins which makes the scenario of naturally occurring evolution far more likely than any scenario of laboratory manipulation. In fact we have clear history of zoonotic origin of lethal coronavirus outbreaks such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The paper by Li-Meng et al. does not provide any robust evidence of artificial manipulation, no statistical test of alternative hypotheses (natural evolution vs artificial manipulation) and is highly speculative.

AI Verified (Sep 15, 2020)

Source:

Gkikas Magiorkinis, expert reaction published by the Science Media Centre, September 15, 2020.

3mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

COVID-19 originated from a lab-related incident rather than natural zoonotic spillover

votes Against

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Relevant: the quote directly addresses the same SARS-CoV-2 origin question, explicitly saying natural evolution from animal reservoirs is far more likely than laboratory manipulation and that the opposing preprint lacks robust evidence, so the author's stance on the complete statement is clearly determinable. ([sciencemediacentre.org](https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-preprint-entitled-unusual-features-of-the-sars-cov-2-genome-suggesting-sophisticated-laboratory-modification-rather-than-natural-evolution-and-delineation-of-its-probable-s/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

Vote inference verification history Latest opinion AI Verified Report this

AI Verified He says animal coronaviruses make "naturally occurring evolution far more likely than any scenario of laboratory manipulation" and that the paper provides "no robust evidence of artificial manipulation," so he is opposing the lab-origin claim here, though his wording is most directly about lab manipulation rather than every possible lab-leak variant. ([sciencemediacentre.org](https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-preprint-entitled-unusual-features-of-the-sars-cov-2-genome-suggesting-sophisticated-laboratory-modification-rather-than-natural-evolution-and-delineation-of-its-probable-s/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Verified: the Science Media Centre page dated 2020-09-15 attributes this statement to Dr Gkikas Magiorkinis and contains the quoted text verbatim, aside from a line break after “Li-Meng et al.” that does not change the wording. The stored author name, date, and source URL are correct. ([sciencemediacentre.org](https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-preprint-entitled-unusual-features-of-the-sars-cov-2-genome-suggesting-sophisticated-laboratory-modification-rather-than-natural-evolution-and-delineation-of-its-probable-s/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

replying to Gkikas Magiorkinis

Other opinions from Gkikas Magiorkinis

See all

Gkikas Magiorkinis votes Against

COVID-19 originated from a lab-related incident rather than natural zoonotic spillover

Closely related coronaviruses have been retrieved from animals such as bats and pangolins which makes the scenario of naturally occurring evolution far more likely than any scenario of laboratory manipulation.

AI Verified source (Sep 15, 2020)