Comment by Robert F. Garry

Virologist, Tulane University School of Medicine
Three and a half years into the COVID-19 pandemic, it is still my opinion that there is no credible scientific evidence for a lab-based origin for SARS-CoV-2.
AI Verified (Jul 11, 2023)
Like Share on X 20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: Garry directly addresses the statement’s core issue by saying there is no credible scientific evidence for a lab-based origin of SARS-CoV-2, and the surrounding testimony says natural-origin scenarios were most plausible. That makes a stance against the complete statement substantially more likely. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg53002/html/CHRG-118hhrg53002.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified He is against: he explicitly says there is "no credible scientific evidence for a lab-based origin for SARS-CoV-2," and the surrounding testimony says he regarded natural-origin scenarios as most plausible and later evidence as supporting that view. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg53002/html/CHRG-118hhrg53002.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified. The provided govinfo hearing transcript is dated July 11, 2023 and identifies “STATEMENT OF DR. ROBERT GARRY”; within that statement, lines 515–517 contain the exact sentence submitted here, so the quote is verbatim and correctly attributed to Robert F. Garry. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg53002/html/CHRG-118hhrg53002.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago
replying to Robert F. Garry