YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Jess Zaccagnino

Human avatar
Policy counsel at the ACLU of Connecticut.
The bill requires transparency, bias audits, and human oversight when these technologies are used in hiring, discipline, scheduling, performance evaluation, or other employment-related decisions.
AI Verified (Mar 10, 2026)
Source:
Written Testimony Supporting Senate Bill 435, An Act Concerning Automated Decision Systems Protections for Employees
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Ban fully automated hiring decisions without human review
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly concerns SB 435's employment safeguards, so it is relevant to banning fully automated hiring decisions without human review. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports the employment protections in SB 435; the recorded 'for' answer matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified against the ACLU-CT testimony snippet; the quote matches the SB 435 testimony about transparency, bias audits, and human oversight. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Jess Zaccagnino