Comment by Washington Examiner

U.S. news publication covering politics, policy, and public affairs.
Ridley described his argument as a "good old Bayesian thing, you add up all the probabilities until you get to a final result," or a court case in which a jury reaches the most reasonable conclusion.
AI Verified (Mar 20, 2026)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Ridley explicitly describes his argument as a "good old Bayesian thing" that adds probabilities toward a final conclusion, which directly matches the statement about Bayesian analysis. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Ridley explicitly says his argument is a "good old Bayesian thing" that adds probabilities to a final result, so the recorded answer "for" is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Washington Examiner lines 139-142 quote Ridley describing his case as a "good old Bayesian thing" and comparing it to a jury reaching the most reasonable conclusion; the stored quote is verbatim and correctly attributed. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2h ago
replying to Washington Examiner