We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Washington Examiner
U.S. news publication covering politics, policy, and public affairs.
Ridley described his argument as a "good old Bayesian thing, you add up all the probabilities until you get to a final result," or a court case in which a jury reaches the most reasonable conclusion.AI Verified (Mar 20, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Ridley explicitly describes his argument as a "good old Bayesian thing" that adds probabilities toward a final conclusion, which directly matches the statement about Bayesian analysis.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 2h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Ridley explicitly says his argument is a "good old Bayesian thing" that adds probabilities to a final result, so the recorded answer "for" is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Washington Examiner lines 139-142 quote Ridley describing his case as a "good old Bayesian thing" and comparing it to a jury reaching the most reasonable conclusion; the stored quote is verbatim and correctly attributed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 2h ago
replying to Washington Examiner