Jalekam Kakkar on AI companies should be liable for harms…

Jalekam Kakkar

Executive Director of the Centre for Communication Governance at National Law University Delhi.

Justice systems will have to bridge accountability gaps of who is truly liable. They will have to grapple with the transparency questions. How does the person who's affected prove harm and gather evidence without access to models and information around how they are being impacted? We will have to think about shifting of burden, perhaps on companies, to demonstrate that harm is not present in a given situation.

AI Verified (Jul 7, 2026)

Source:

Thematic discussion 4: Respecting, protecting and promoting human rights, Global Dialogue on AI Governance, UN Transcripts, July 7, 2026.

2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

votes For

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified The accountability and liability discussion supports holding AI companies liable for deployment harms. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Kakkar’s liability and burden-of-proof discussion supports company responsibility; recorded answer for matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified UN transcript supports the stored accountability-and-liability passage in the cited discussion. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

replying to Jalekam Kakkar

Other opinions from Jalekam Kakkar

See all

Jalekam Kakkar votes For

Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems

So every system, you know, predeployment through the design stage needs to be thought through. We need to have certification and post-deployment monitoring of harms and impacts.

AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)