Comment by Daria Kim

Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, researching artificial intelligence, intellectual property, and technology law.
This misconception has given rise to a range of untenable normative claims – from proposals to recognise legal personhood for AI systems (including for the purposes of allocating liability), to calls for abolishing intellectual property (IP) law and imposing a moratorium for lack of any other instrument to address the control problem.
AI Verified (Jan 29, 2026)
Like Share on X 19h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Explicitly characterizes AI legal-personhood proposals as untenable normative claims. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 17h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Calling legal-personhood proposals untenable supports against. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 17h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Exact wording and attribution confirmed in cited source: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/content/event/autonomous-ai-agents-complex-systems-role-framing-policy-and-law-making · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 17h ago
replying to Daria Kim