YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Jay Adkisson

Human avatar
Attorney and Forbes legal commentator writing on trusts, asset protection, and artificial-intelligence legal issues.
So, despite having something like intelligence, sort of, and certainly the ability to communicate like a human, AI should not be considered a legal person.
AI Verified (Mar 7, 2026)
Source:
Jay Adkisson, “U.S. v. Heppner: Why Your AI Chats Are Not Privileged,” Forbes, March 7, 2026.
Like Share on X 19h ago
Policy proposals and claims
AI agents should be granted legal personhood as non-human corporations
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly rejects legal personhood for AI. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded against matches the explicit rejection of AI legal personhood. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Forbes article by Jay Adkisson contains the stored sentence verbatim and presents it as his analysis (7 Mar 2026). · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19h ago
replying to Jay Adkisson