YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Mike Lambert

Human avatar
Member of Technical Staff at Anthropic; signatory to the July 2026 Pacing the Frontier statement.
There are a wide diversity of opinions on where AI progress goes next and what the future looks like, but regardless of one's beliefs, the option to control the pace of progress if we end up in one of the bad scenarios seems like an incredibly valuable safety net to have in our back pocket, and I believe it is important to support and build that capability now.
AI Verified (Jul 2026)
Source:
Mike Lambert, personal comment published with “Pacing the Frontier,” July 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Supports having the ability to slow AI progress for bad scenarios as a safety net; strongly bears on pausing superintelligence pending safety. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified A safety-net ability to slow AI progress in dangerous scenarios implies support for pausing superintelligence pending safety. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Source page’s Personal Comments lists this wording under Mike Lambert (July 2026). · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Mike Lambert