YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Andrew Doris

Human avatar
Representative of the Secure AI Project who testified on AI safety policy.
We think that the smart way to balance these two truths is to allow AI developers to write their own safety standards, but require them to be transparent about what they are, so we can hold them to their own promises.
AI Verified (Feb 11, 2026)
Source:
Andrew Doris, quoted in Nebraska Legislature’s Unicameral Update, “AI safety regulations considered,” 11 February 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Unicameral Update reports Doris testifying for LB1083, which requires large AI developers to publicly post risk-reduction plans; his quote specifically endorses transparent developer safety standards. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded for matches Doris’s support for transparent AI-developer safety standards and public accountability. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Nebraska Legislature Unicameral Update (11 Feb 2026), lines 52–54, attributes this exact statement to Andrew Doris. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 1h ago
replying to Andrew Doris