Comment by Rory Erlich

The fact that Sacks and his allies have nonetheless decided to go after HB 286, and consider it “unfixable,” says a lot about what their AI agenda actually is. It’s not about going after the most onerous state AI bills, but going after any and all of them.
AI Verified (Feb 25, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The source criticizes federal efforts to defeat state AI legislation, strongly indicating support for states retaining stricter AI-safety authority. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer: for. The source criticizes federal opposition to state AI legislation, implying support for stricter state standards. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Model Republic, Feb. 25, 2026, attributes this exact wording to Rory Erlich. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Rory Erlich