YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Michael Earls

Human avatar
If the human-in-the-loop is going to stay in the loop, two things have to be true: The human has to have the capacity to keep up with the loop’s pace. The human has to have the clarity to evaluate what they’re approving against actual goals — not just rubber-stamp whatever flows past.
AI Verified (Jun 9, 2026)
Source:
Michael Earls, “The Other Alignment Problem,” June 9, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The passage argues humans must retain capacity and clarity to evaluate AI-agent approvals, directly supporting meaningful human-in-the-loop oversight. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Earls argues a human must be able to evaluate AI-agent approvals rather than rubber-stamp them; correct answer: for. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Michael Earls’s June 9, 2026 post contains this passage verbatim under his byline. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Michael Earls