Comment by David Klotz

Author of a 2026 paper on the ethical implications of artificial general intelligence.
We argue that general intelligence may be the only biological strategy that generates existential threats to the species possessing it, an existential risk paradox with no parallel among non-intelligent survival strategies. Unlike prevailing accounts of AI risk that trace the danger to misalignment, we locate it in structural features of general intelligence itself, implying that even well-aligned AGI would inherit this liability. If the long-term evolutionary value of general intelligence is uncertain or negative, this raises ethical questions about engineering AGI.
AI Verified (Aug 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 35min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The source argues general intelligence entails existential-risk liability and calls for caution about engineering AGI, opposing building AGI. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 22min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The source argues for caution due to AGI's structural existential-risk liability, matching the recorded against position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 22min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified arXiv:2608.10730 abstract (11 Aug 2026) reproduces the stored passage and names David Klotz. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 22min ago
replying to David Klotz