We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David Klotz
Author of a 2026 paper on the ethical implications of artificial general intelligence.
We argue that general intelligence may be the only biological strategy that generates existential threats to the species possessing it, an existential risk paradox with no parallel among non-intelligent survival strategies. Unlike prevailing accounts of AI risk that trace the danger to misalignment, we locate it in structural features of general intelligence itself, implying that even well-aligned AGI would inherit this liability. If the long-term evolutionary value of general intelligence is uncertain or negative, this raises ethical questions about engineering AGI.AI Verified (Aug 11, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The source argues general intelligence entails existential-risk liability and calls for caution about engineering AGI, opposing building AGI.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 22min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The source argues for caution due to AGI's structural existential-risk liability, matching the recorded against position.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 22min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
arXiv:2608.10730 abstract (11 Aug 2026) reproduces the stored passage and names David Klotz.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 22min ago
replying to David Klotz