Comment by Jean-Paul Van Belle

Author of a 2026 paper on sentient artificial superintelligence and AGI ethics.
This paper suggests the adoption of a novel inversion in AI ethics: instead of asking how humans should treat artificial superintelligence (ASI), it examines how future sentient ASI may morally consider and evaluate humanity. We are not only designing intelligent systems but also shaping the initial conditions under which those systems form judgments about us. The paper proposes a preliminary set of post-human moral principles that may govern sentient ASI actions.
AI Verified (Jul 16, 2026)
Like Share on X 35min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The source explicitly discusses future sentient ASI and conditions under which it forms moral judgments, supporting the possibility of AI consciousness. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 22min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The source explicitly considers future sentient ASI, matching the recorded for position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 21min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified arXiv:2607.14998 abstract (16 Jul 2026) reproduces the stored passage and names Jean-Paul Van Belle. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 22min ago
replying to Jean-Paul Van Belle