Comment by David Thorstad

Author of 2026 research on instrumental convergence and AI power-seeking.
I show how the argument from power-seeking rests on a strong version of a claim known as the instrumental convergence thesis. I explore leading defenses of the instrumental convergence thesis and argue that none establishes the thesis in a strong enough form to ground the argument from power-seeking.
AI Verified (Jun 7, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The sourced passage directly assesses AI existential-risk arguments; rejecting the cited power-seeking basis strongly implies opposition to the stated existential-threat claim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The source rejects a proposed basis for the claim that AI poses existential risk; the recorded answer against matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified arXiv 2606.08832 abstract, submitted 7 Jun 2026, attributes this exact passage to David Thorstad. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to David Thorstad