We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Tommy Shaffer-Shane
Senior AI Policy Manager at the Centre for Long-Term Resilience and project lead of its Loss of Control Observatory.
They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are happening, particularly on internally deployed models. There needs to be greater emphasis at those labs on systematic monitoring.AI Verified (Aug 29, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote calls for companies to report AI incidents, including near misses, and for systematic monitoring; the cited article adds that the Observatory wants government-required reporting of severe incidents. This strongly signals a stance on mandatory critical-incident reporting despite not specifying the 72-hour window.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-sol
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The recorded answer 'for' matches the quote's call for incident reporting and the source context's explicit support for a government requirement that AI companies report severe loss-of-control incidents. The exact 72-hour deadline is not stated, but support for the proposal is substantially more likely than opposition or abstention.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-sol
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The Guardian article dated 2026-08-29 reproduces this wording verbatim and attributes all three sentences to Tommy Shaffer-Shane (paras. 75–76). The stored URL, author, and day-level date match the source.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-sol
· 1h ago
replying to Tommy Shaffer-Shane