Comment by Daryl Spence

Economist at Capital Group with more than three decades covering the U.S. economy.
The ones that might change the incentive structure is you could tax capital, obviously, make capital more expensive, rather relative to labor. I don't know if that's a compute tax or an AI tax, or something like that, that would slow probably the disruption, but maybe not completely change it.
AI Verified (Aug 25, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Spence proposes taxing capital relative to labour to slow AI-driven disruption. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Spence favors taxing capital relative to labour amid AI disruption. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Published Moody’s transcript identifies Daryl Spence and contains the quoted tax-capital passage. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
replying to Daryl Spence

Other authors to follow