Fathom on AI labs should give independent evaluat…

Fathom

Independent nonprofit developing AI-governance and independent-verification frameworks.

Third-party experts — granted real access to the most capable frontier models — independently evaluate the risks, review the companies' own claims, and publish whether they agree. It's the difference between taking a company's word for it and having independent experts actually check the work for everyone.

AI Verified (Aug 2026)

Source:

Fathom, LinkedIn post describing Massachusetts Senate bill S.3178; page displays the post as one month old as of 13 September 2026.

20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI labs should give independent evaluators employee-like access

votes For

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Fathom explicitly describes third-party experts receiving real access to frontier models to independently evaluate risks and company claims, directly matching the statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Recorded answer is for. Fathom endorses a model where third-party experts receive real access to frontier models and independently check companies’ claims. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Fathom’s public LinkedIn post contains the stored wording about third-party experts receiving real access and independently checking company claims; the post is presented as Fathom’s organizational position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

replying to Fathom

Other opinions from Fathom

See all

Fathom votes For

Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems

The bill gets the fundamentals correct. It sets one public standard – the adequate mitigation of catastrophic risk – and holds both the AI companies and their independent verifiers accountable to it.

AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)